Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Hunter overcrowding and the privatization of access
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MidTennFisher" data-source="post: 5845358" data-attributes="member: 11842"><p>That's the other option, besides developers buying. Neither option results in an increase of the number of huntable acres per hunter. Even if the land is bought and turns into a high dollar hunt club, that is not considered huntable acres per hunter in my opinion. That is huntable acres for a few wealthy people. I could never step foot on that land. </p><p></p><p>That's why Matt Rinella said they literally use our money from the products we buy to ensure we have fewer places to use the products we bought. He is certainly correct about that. </p><p></p><p>Private land that is turned into a "hunting property" and then sold for an outrageous price to the wealthy that can afford it is not preserving hunting for the future. It's preserving hunting for the wealthy, which is not the direction this needs to continue in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MidTennFisher, post: 5845358, member: 11842"] That's the other option, besides developers buying. Neither option results in an increase of the number of huntable acres per hunter. Even if the land is bought and turns into a high dollar hunt club, that is not considered huntable acres per hunter in my opinion. That is huntable acres for a few wealthy people. I could never step foot on that land. That's why Matt Rinella said they literally use our money from the products we buy to ensure we have fewer places to use the products we bought. He is certainly correct about that. Private land that is turned into a "hunting property" and then sold for an outrageous price to the wealthy that can afford it is not preserving hunting for the future. It's preserving hunting for the wealthy, which is not the direction this needs to continue in. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Hunter overcrowding and the privatization of access
Top