Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Florida makes Buck Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shed Hunter" data-source="post: 3923776" data-attributes="member: 10556"><p>Or a better idea would be to select two below average counties, two average counties, and two above average counties.</p><p></p><p>Based on what I've learned from you-the most improvement (maybe not percentage wose, but what will jump out as wow-that is the place to go) would be the area that is already good for the simple reason those areas are most likely good because of their habitat. The actual percentages of mature bucks will not jump out as a signifigant imcrease, BUT there will be many more of them as the habitat can support more deer in those areas. I.e. it goes back to the argument of why is the mid west so much "better". Those river drainage areas you mentioned in Iowa are something TN will never be able to have. I forget what deer density you said they can sustain and I doubt anywhere in TN can pull that of, but we can have the next step down in out better habitat areas. They hold a fair amount of B&C deer in those areas-I bet a few areas of TN could at least have one every year or two rather than once in a blue moon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shed Hunter, post: 3923776, member: 10556"] Or a better idea would be to select two below average counties, two average counties, and two above average counties. Based on what I've learned from you-the most improvement (maybe not percentage wose, but what will jump out as wow-that is the place to go) would be the area that is already good for the simple reason those areas are most likely good because of their habitat. The actual percentages of mature bucks will not jump out as a signifigant imcrease, BUT there will be many more of them as the habitat can support more deer in those areas. I.e. it goes back to the argument of why is the mid west so much "better". Those river drainage areas you mentioned in Iowa are something TN will never be able to have. I forget what deer density you said they can sustain and I doubt anywhere in TN can pull that of, but we can have the next step down in out better habitat areas. They hold a fair amount of B&C deer in those areas-I bet a few areas of TN could at least have one every year or two rather than once in a blue moon [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Deer Hunting Forum
Florida makes Buck Changes
Top