Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Don't forget that tomorrow is NSD....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PalsPal" data-source="post: 4719687" data-attributes="member: 12242"><p>LOL, they were better than a 4-8 team, but I'm sure that you know that and probably argued that somewhere. Last year was impressive for Mullen, but didn't Muschamp win 11 one year <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> :rotf: ?</p><p></p><p>BTW, here's some numbers for you to chew on a while :lol: !</p><p></p><p><strong><em>Team rankings are exciting, but can also be deceiving. The better benchmark is SB Nation's blue chip ratio: if you want to be in the national championship conversation, at least half of your signees need to be four-or-five star players.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Here's the post-Fulmer era in blue chip ratio:</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Year Blue Chip Signees Ratio</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2019 13 23 0.565</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2018 8 22 0.364</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2017 5 28 0.179</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2016 10 23 0.435</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2015 16 30 0.533</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2014 16 32 0.500</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2013 4 23 0.174</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2012 10 22 0.455</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2011 9 27 0.333</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2010 12 27 0.444</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>2009 9 21 0.429</em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PalsPal, post: 4719687, member: 12242"] LOL, they were better than a 4-8 team, but I'm sure that you know that and probably argued that somewhere. Last year was impressive for Mullen, but didn't Muschamp win 11 one year ;) :rotf: ? BTW, here's some numbers for you to chew on a while :lol: ! [b][i]Team rankings are exciting, but can also be deceiving. The better benchmark is SB Nation’s blue chip ratio: if you want to be in the national championship conversation, at least half of your signees need to be four-or-five star players. Here’s the post-Fulmer era in blue chip ratio: Year Blue Chip Signees Ratio 2019 13 23 0.565 2018 8 22 0.364 2017 5 28 0.179 2016 10 23 0.435 2015 16 30 0.533 2014 16 32 0.500 2013 4 23 0.174 2012 10 22 0.455 2011 9 27 0.333 2010 12 27 0.444 2009 9 21 0.429[/i][/b] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
Don't forget that tomorrow is NSD....
Top