Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
Didn't see that coming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Poleaxe" data-source="post: 4431541" data-attributes="member: 12090"><p>I just got done watching the TFWC committee meeting days ago. Didn't know there was even a possibility about a multiple harvest per day out there. After watching a pointless presentation only to have the presenter saying nervously "we don't know" it makes me wonder just what her expertise is in. I don't have my doctorate in birds but IMO the best data I saw was the incline of harvest every year on the graph and that's even with the ones checked in. I can't grasp the idiocy at the topic of conversation about the possibility increasing daily bag limit when minutes later your clueless about overharvest. I could feel the frustration that Mr Cox was trying to get out that not one other being on that panel understood. If your wanting funding for a study on complaints with hunter satisfaction/success to help change those complaints why not eliminate the killing of females together? To me it's kinda like economics, supply and demand. In order to reach demand (comfortability # also) more product has to be supplied. I bookmarked that part and I know next year's will sound like a broken record. If the numbers are still inclining they should've not made anybody in that room any dumber and left it like it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Poleaxe, post: 4431541, member: 12090"] I just got done watching the TFWC committee meeting days ago. Didn't know there was even a possibility about a multiple harvest per day out there. After watching a pointless presentation only to have the presenter saying nervously "we don't know" it makes me wonder just what her expertise is in. I don't have my doctorate in birds but IMO the best data I saw was the incline of harvest every year on the graph and that's even with the ones checked in. I can't grasp the idiocy at the topic of conversation about the possibility increasing daily bag limit when minutes later your clueless about overharvest. I could feel the frustration that Mr Cox was trying to get out that not one other being on that panel understood. If your wanting funding for a study on complaints with hunter satisfaction/success to help change those complaints why not eliminate the killing of females together? To me it's kinda like economics, supply and demand. In order to reach demand (comfortability # also) more product has to be supplied. I bookmarked that part and I know next year's will sound like a broken record. If the numbers are still inclining they should've not made anybody in that room any dumber and left it like it is. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
Didn't see that coming
Top