Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
Alabama Tightening the Screws
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="th88" data-source="post: 5113107" data-attributes="member: 16217"><p>It'd make me feel better if states banned the practice of commercial use/making a profit of our public lands. Or at least require a permitting system with hefty costs attached. Depending on how long this current trend lasts, I wouldn't doubt seeing regulations like the above implemented in the future. I'm pretty sure Missouri already has something similar. They may not allow filming on state owned conservation areas for commercial use? Can't remember the specifics, been a minute since I looked it up.</p><p></p><p>There is a recent federal court case about film permits on federal lands. Basically, "A federal judge has struck down as unconstitutional the National Park Service's practice of charging commercial filmmakers who want to shoot in the National Park System, ruling it is a protected activity under the First Amendment."</p><p> </p><p>Can read about it at the following link:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2021/01/judge-commercial-filmmakers-dont-need-permits-national-parks[/URL]</p><p></p><p>So looks like they will always be free to film their hunts on federal lands. Not surprising. Fortunately most states out west already have a good grasp on protecting their resource with permit allocations, draws, etc. Which is very possibly coming for turkey too at this current path. Or can just take the Bama approach and push public land seasons way back and drastically reduce opportunity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="th88, post: 5113107, member: 16217"] It'd make me feel better if states banned the practice of commercial use/making a profit of our public lands. Or at least require a permitting system with hefty costs attached. Depending on how long this current trend lasts, I wouldn't doubt seeing regulations like the above implemented in the future. I'm pretty sure Missouri already has something similar. They may not allow filming on state owned conservation areas for commercial use? Can't remember the specifics, been a minute since I looked it up. There is a recent federal court case about film permits on federal lands. Basically, "A federal judge has struck down as unconstitutional the National Park Service's practice of charging commercial filmmakers who want to shoot in the National Park System, ruling it is a protected activity under the First Amendment." Can read about it at the following link: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2021/01/judge-commercial-filmmakers-dont-need-permits-national-parks[/URL] So looks like they will always be free to film their hunts on federal lands. Not surprising. Fortunately most states out west already have a good grasp on protecting their resource with permit allocations, draws, etc. Which is very possibly coming for turkey too at this current path. Or can just take the Bama approach and push public land seasons way back and drastically reduce opportunity. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Long Beards & Spurs
Alabama Tightening the Screws
Top