Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Gun Owners Forums
Reloading
243 100 grain nosler partition load
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaveB" data-source="post: 5364227" data-attributes="member: 5958"><p>No experience with that powder in any caliber just yet. I have some for 140's in our 6.5 </p><p></p><p>Heavy for caliber bullets like slower burning powders (a general rule). There are other powders than H4350-RL19 and IMR7828</p><p></p><p>IMR7828 in the 243 is an absolute perfect load for the 100 and 105 partitions. Great velocity and accuracy. And IMR7828 is generally available</p><p></p><p>Our 243 is a 1985-era Remington 700 ADL. This rifle has a long throat and bullets were loaded that way as IMR7828 frequently is a compressed charge. On the Tejon Ranch in Southern Califiornia we killed 8 or 9 deer at distances ranging from 40 to 140 yards all with the 100 gr partition and IMR7828. </p><p></p><p>This is one rifle I have not yet been successful in converting to Accubonds. The primary reason is accuracy with the heavier partitions and multiple powders that produce the accuracy and velocity I want. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]138820[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]138821[/ATTACH]</p><p>So, my suggestion is if at all possible get hold of some IMR7828.</p><p>Here is Hodgdon's numbers on the 100 and notice the max load achieves my objective of 3,000 FPS. </p><p> </p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>IMR</td><td>IMR 7828</td><td> </td><td>0.243"</td><td>2.650"</td><td></td><td>42.5</td><td>2,796</td><td>43,700 CUP</td><td></td><td>46.0C*</td><td>3,009</td><td>51,100 CUP</td><td><br /> <br /> </td></tr></table></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaveB, post: 5364227, member: 5958"] No experience with that powder in any caliber just yet. I have some for 140's in our 6.5 Heavy for caliber bullets like slower burning powders (a general rule). There are other powders than H4350-RL19 and IMR7828 IMR7828 in the 243 is an absolute perfect load for the 100 and 105 partitions. Great velocity and accuracy. And IMR7828 is generally available Our 243 is a 1985-era Remington 700 ADL. This rifle has a long throat and bullets were loaded that way as IMR7828 frequently is a compressed charge. On the Tejon Ranch in Southern Califiornia we killed 8 or 9 deer at distances ranging from 40 to 140 yards all with the 100 gr partition and IMR7828. This is one rifle I have not yet been successful in converting to Accubonds. The primary reason is accuracy with the heavier partitions and multiple powders that produce the accuracy and velocity I want. [ATTACH type="full"]138820[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full"]138821[/ATTACH] So, my suggestion is if at all possible get hold of some IMR7828. Here is Hodgdon's numbers on the 100 and notice the max load achieves my objective of 3,000 FPS. [TABLE] [TR] [TD]IMR[/TD] [TD]IMR 7828[/TD] [TD] [/TD] [TD]0.243"[/TD] [TD]2.650"[/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD]42.5[/TD] [TD]2,796[/TD] [TD]43,700 CUP[/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD]46.0C*[/TD] [TD]3,009[/TD] [TD]51,100 CUP[/TD] [TD] [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Gun Owners Forums
Reloading
243 100 grain nosler partition load
Top