Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Hunting - other than deer
200% Licence Increase for WY NR Hunters In the Works
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AT Hiker" data-source="post: 5554229" data-attributes="member: 10019"><p>OK, after some deep thought and discussing this with Big Johnson and Stinky Breath it makes more sense...sorta.</p><p></p><p>Basically, this is the same exact bill (minus some wording, I assume) that got voted down a couple weeks ago. The 40% of tags represent the special allocations, the scratched out figures represent the current difference between regular and special tags. Take antelope for example; current regular tag is $326, special is $614 which is a diff of $288 (which is what is scratched out in the bill). Now the new difference proposed is $874, which add that to the regular tag would then make the new special antelope tag $1200.</p><p></p><p>***I think I figured out what happened. Per the Eastmans blog [USER=2474]@tellico4x4[/USER] shared it appears the original bill wouldn't pass the constitutional sniff test. Appears the original bill started out in the Senate vs the House where it should have. This current bill is the exact same, it is just following the correct procedures this time. </p><p></p><p>No wonder crap gets passed not knowing what is in the bill.</p><p></p><p>So here is an AT Hiker interpretation of this highlighted in red</p><p>Nonresident elk license ...... <s>$576.00</s> <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">(current difference between reg/spec)</span> <u>$1,258.00</u><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"> (propsed diff between reg/spec)</span> in addition to the license fee<span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"> (reg fee is currently $692)</span> imposed under paragraph (j)(xix) of this section; <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Making the NR<em> <u>special</u></em> elk tag fee $1950 vs the current $1268.</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>(ii) Nonresident deer license .... <s>$288.00</s> <u>$826.00</u> in addition to the license fee imposed under paragraph (j)(xv) of this section; <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Making the NR<em> <u>special</u> </em>deer tag fee $1200 vs the current $662.</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>(iii) Nonresident antelope license ..... <s>$288.00</s> <u>$874.00</u> in addition to the license fee imposed under paragraph (j)(xxxi) of this <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Making the NR <em><u>special</u></em> antelope tag fee $1200 vs the current $614.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AT Hiker, post: 5554229, member: 10019"] OK, after some deep thought and discussing this with Big Johnson and Stinky Breath it makes more sense...sorta. Basically, this is the same exact bill (minus some wording, I assume) that got voted down a couple weeks ago. The 40% of tags represent the special allocations, the scratched out figures represent the current difference between regular and special tags. Take antelope for example; current regular tag is $326, special is $614 which is a diff of $288 (which is what is scratched out in the bill). Now the new difference proposed is $874, which add that to the regular tag would then make the new special antelope tag $1200. ***I think I figured out what happened. Per the Eastmans blog [USER=2474]@tellico4x4[/USER] shared it appears the original bill wouldn't pass the constitutional sniff test. Appears the original bill started out in the Senate vs the House where it should have. This current bill is the exact same, it is just following the correct procedures this time. No wonder crap gets passed not knowing what is in the bill. So here is an AT Hiker interpretation of this highlighted in red Nonresident elk license ...... [S]$576.00[/S] [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)](current difference between reg/spec)[/COLOR] [U]$1,258.00[/U][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)] (propsed diff between reg/spec)[/COLOR] in addition to the license fee[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)] (reg fee is currently $692)[/COLOR] imposed under paragraph (j)(xix) of this section; [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Making the NR[I] [U]special[/U][/I] elk tag fee $1950 vs the current $1268.[/COLOR] (ii) Nonresident deer license .... [S]$288.00[/S] [U]$826.00[/U] in addition to the license fee imposed under paragraph (j)(xv) of this section; [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Making the NR[I] [U]special[/U] [/I]deer tag fee $1200 vs the current $662.[/COLOR] (iii) Nonresident antelope license ..... [S]$288.00[/S] [U]$874.00[/U] in addition to the license fee imposed under paragraph (j)(xxxi) of this [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Making the NR [I][U]special[/U][/I] antelope tag fee $1200 vs the current $614.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Hunting - other than deer
200% Licence Increase for WY NR Hunters In the Works
Top