TheLBLman
Well-Known Member
That can work well with two neighboring states like TN & KY.I have always believed it should be reciprocal.
Non-res should pay exactly what Tennesseans pay as non-res in their home state. Cumulative.
Total cost for equivalent licensing
But don't see a state like Wyoming reciprocating with TN or KY.
Wyoming basically has nothing to lose and everything to gain with their high fees,
so long as hunters keep paying them (which I predict they will not).
Wyoming has relatively few residents.
About as many people live in Louisville, KY as the entire state of Wyoming?
And, what's the odds any Wyoming resident desires to come hunt in TN or KY?
We go there, but they don't come.
So until hunters stop paying their outlandish fees,
they will continue to charge them.
From one, albeit a bit biased perhaps, perspective, many western states like Wyoming are exploiting non-resident hunters, whereas TN has been exploiting resident hunters (regarding how season dates were set, and fees accessed to non-residents vs residents).
TN's 2-week delay in opening turkey season went a long way to alleviate this issue.
Last edited: