Just want to preface this by saying I believe we are very fortunate in having Mark Gudlin as our Chief of Wildlife at TWRA.
He has earned it with his decades of dedication and professionalism, starting at the bottom, working his way to the top.
The perfect guy for this role.
rsimms":29n506m2 said:
TWRA's Chief of Wildlife explains why Tennessee's deer harvest dropped significantly this season.
Gudlin blames the decline on
two major factors.
"We had an unusually
warm weather during muzzleloader season," said Gudlin.
"The harvest in that season alone was down 23 percent.
We also had a
huge EHD outbreak in the eastern half of the state."
As for the reduced harvest during muzzleloader season, Gudlin said extreme warm weather has a tendency to keep hunters out of the woods because it's uncomfortable and more difficult to properly care for harvested deer.
"People just won't go when it's warm," he said. "People may choose to go fishing instead."
I totally agree with Mark.
The 3rd major factor was just less deer hunting (on average) per hunter for the season.
This has been a ongoing trend, but accelerated a bit in 2018 in part due to those first two factors.
It's all interrelated.
Did you personally hunt as many days in 2018 as you averaged over the past few years?
Just saying, most did not.
The reasons are many.
As to the 2-buck limit, don't see that as much a factor in the total deer harvest, although it is a factor in the total buck harvest. It is virtually a non-factor regarding how much or how little hunters were afield in 2018. It "should" have slightly decreased the buck harvest, while slightly increasing the doe harvest. However, the 2017 change in the antlerless/antlered definition "should" have decreased the doe harvest as well as the button buck and yearling buck harvest.
Unfortunately for data accuracy, antler definition changes, the recent fast embracing of smart phones for telecheck, and no longer having to field tag a deer before moving, appear to have contributed to more deer not being checked in at all (particularly the younger deer of both sexes).
I do believe the data in it's saying the harvest is less than the prior year, but do not believe it's actually as much less as it appears. Ongoing annual trend data should remain reasonably reliable (without any more changes made to the system or definitions), just maybe not as accurate as in times past.
Too much changed in too short a time horizon, imo, has made it "too easy"
NOT to check in a deer,
even though the primary reason may be a hunter making an honest mistake (which became more likely under the 2017 antler definition changes).
But IMO, we need an improved method of field checking deer,
such as tags that must be attached before the deer is moved from the property killed.
In the meantime, the system isn't broken and is actually "easier" for hunters to check in their deer.
It's just easier "not" to as well, particularly regarding the growing number who process their own venison.