Tndeer Logo

Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
#3371043 - 09/23/13 11:37 AM Is there a "con" man in the oval office?
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19308
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/09/18/is-there-con-man-in-oval-office/?intcmp=obnetwork

PARAPHRASED ---- Click the link for full content


I keep asking myself: Why Syria? Why now?
No war in America history has ever been opposed by 71% of the citizens, or 75% of the military.

Then, when you realize Obama has had so many scandals and failures to hide, war is the perfect cover story to mask the most disastrous record in modern presidential history. Obama is a desperate man. He has to cover-up the truth.

The media headlines should be about the massive IRS scandal . . . . .

Without IRS attacks, intimidation, and interference, Tea Party groups would have had the same influence as 2010 -- when their raging energy and passionate “fire and brimstone” led directly to the biggest Republican Congressional landslide in modern history.

Does anyone doubt that?

Heck we now have emails from IRS officials stating exactly that -- that Tea Parties had to be stopped if Democrats wanted to win the election.

Suddenly, mysteriously, in 2012 all the energy and momentum went out of the Tea Party movement.

Now we know why.
Obama used the IRS to fix the presidential election.
Fraud was committed to re-elect Barack Obama. Our country was hijacked . . . . . . .

Think I’m wrong? Evidently the IRS officials don’t.

Several of them have been busy hiring the most famous and expensive law firms in Washington, D.C. to defend themselves.

Where are they getting the money?
Is Obama or the Democratic National Committee arranging for big Democratic donors to pay for their legal fees? Why would Obama do that?

It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure out that Obama is frightened to death about what these IRS officials will say under oath. Their testimony could end his presidency and destroy his legacy.

Top
#3371044 - 09/23/13 11:38 AM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: Wes Parrish]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19308
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
The media headlines should be about the NSA scandal aimed at violating the civil rights and invading the privacy of every American citizen. Obama has turned out to be worse than Bush when it comes to civil liberties . . . . .

The media headlines should be about Benghazi, too.
Like the IRS scandal, the Benghazi scandal could have changed the outcome of the 2012 presidential election.

Would Obama have been re-elected if the public knew there was no “spontaneous demonstration” outside our embassy that day?

Would Obama have been re-elected if Americans knew that there was time to save those brave heroes defending our embassy, but Obama and Hillary refused to send a rescue team-multiple times?

The media headlines should be about ObamaCare -- a fast moving train wreck about to destroy the entire U.S. economy. It’s so bad that Congress exempted themselves a month ago.

It’s so bad that union leaders met with Obama at the White House to demand they all be exempted, or ObamaCare be repealed. It’s so bad that the head of the IRS testified in front of Congress that he didn’t want ObamaCare -- and he’s in charge of enforcing it.

It’s so bad that the telemarketing company Obama hired to promote ObamaCare employs part-time workers, so they don’t have to offer health insurance to employees. It’s so bad that fast food chains are “sharing” employees, so no one works more than 29 hours- thereby avoiding ObamaCare requirements.

Where are the headlines?

The media headlines should be about this part-time economy created by ObamaCare. The whole country is being reduced to nothing but crummy, crappy, part-time jobs.

Real household income has dropped in every year of Obama's Presidency. A new Census Bureau report reveals that the typical American family under Obama now earns less today than it did in 1989.

We either have a con man in the White House, or a madman.

Top
#3371080 - 09/23/13 12:00 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: Wes Parrish]
AndyW
10 Point


Registered: 10/21/10
Posts: 4383
Loc: Allardt, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Wes Parrish
The media headlines should be about ObamaCare -- a fast moving train wreck about to destroy the entire U.S. economy. It’s so bad that Congress exempted themselves a month ago.


This alone is worthy of revolt. If its good enough for all us lemmings, its good enough for those hacks.
_________________________
This fall, FIRE THEM ALL. Re-elect NO ONE!!!!!

Top
#3371123 - 09/23/13 12:36 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: AndyW]
MUP
Non-Typical


Registered: 08/01/07
Posts: 44853
Loc: Just North of Chatt-town

content Online
Yes...in response to the title of this thread, among other names that would describe him...
_________________________
MUP

Amateurs: Built the Ark

Professionals: Built the Titanic

Top
#3371152 - 09/23/13 12:57 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: MUP]
sgtwebb1
14 Point


Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 9987
Loc: Ooltewah/Harrison TN, USA

Offline
A very succinct article that makes a very concrete case.
He's not just a con man, but a criminal if even ONE of these allegations is true.

And personally, I believe ALL of them are true.

The Republicans and Tea Party need to be screaming about these scandals from the rooftops.
_________________________
~~Death from above~~
)))---------------->>


Visit my Blog:
Sons of LiberTea Blog

Top
#3371170 - 09/23/13 01:07 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: AndyW]
de novo
10 Point


Registered: 07/21/08
Posts: 4031
Loc: Middle TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: AndyW
 Originally Posted By: Wes Parrish
The media headlines should be about ObamaCare -- a fast moving train wreck about to destroy the entire U.S. economy. It’s so bad that Congress exempted themselves a month ago.


This alone is worthy of revolt. If its good enough for all us lemmings, its good enough for those hacks.


I've spent the entire morning researching Obamacare employer mandates and responsibilities. After speaking with several others in the same field, there is a real fear that this legislation will put many out of business and accomplish nothing in improved healthcare.
_________________________
“Reality is what continues to exist whether you believe in it or not.” 

“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.”

Top
#3371206 - 09/23/13 01:33 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: de novo]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19308
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: de novo
. . . there is a real fear that this legislation will put many out of business and accomplish nothing in improved healthcare.

This has already gone from a "fear" to reality, but it's actually much worse.

What's worse?

1) Most Americans are seeing their healthcare cost dramatically increase way beyond what would have happened had there been no ObamaCare.

2) And for most Americans, the quality of health care is not only not improving, but it's becoming much less. This in addition to major financial hits on our economy, lower incomes, new & higher taxes, losses in former freedoms of choice, and losses in so many personal liberties.

At this point, two questions remain:

1) Was this "plan's failure" purposefully intended, the "plan" all along, as a means of total government take-over of everything related to healthcare?

I tend to think this might be the case, since most our nation's problems now seem to be purposefully created for the reason of empowering politicians to have something they can then take credit for fixing (as they grow the government bureaucracy), and by the fact that only democrat politicians voted "for" it. Let us not overlook that not a single republican in congress voted for Obamacare --- and those republicans said Day One it was a plan for failure that would greatly harm our economy.

2) Was this failure of Obamacare really unforeseen, meaning the Obama administration (and all those politicians who voted for it) were totally incompetent?

Perhaps many democratic politicans did not foresee the failure, and they are incompetent for not listening to reason, instead listening to such as Nancy Pelosi saying, "We must pass it to see what's in it." And so they did. Now we know what's in it.

But those who crafted Obamacare, they are getting their planned outcome due to their competency? Is it not happening as they planned?

Top
#3371288 - 09/23/13 02:28 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: Wes Parrish]
iowavf
10 Point


Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 3160
Loc: southwest iowa

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Wes Parrish
 Originally Posted By: de novo
. . . there is a real fear that this legislation will put many out of business and accomplish nothing in improved healthcare.

This has already gone from a "fear" to reality, but it's actually much worse.

What's worse?

1) Most Americans are seeing their healthcare cost dramatically increase way beyond what would have happened had there been no ObamaCare.

2) And for most Americans, the quality of health care is not only not improving, but it's becoming much less. This in addition to major financial hits on our economy, lower incomes, new & higher taxes, losses in former freedoms of choice, and losses in so many personal liberties.

At this point, two questions remain:

1) Was this "plan's failure" purposefully intended, the "plan" all along, as a means of total government take-over of everything related to healthcare?

I tend to think this might be the case, since most our nation's problems now seem to be purposefully created for the reason of empowering politicians to have something they can then take credit for fixing (as they grow the government bureaucracy), and by the fact that only democrat politicians voted "for" it. Let us not overlook that not a single republican in congress voted for Obamacare --- and those republicans said Day One it was a plan for failure that would greatly harm our economy.

2) Was this failure of Obamacare really unforeseen, meaning the Obama administration (and all those politicians who voted for it) were totally incompetent?

Perhaps many democratic politicans did not foresee the failure, and they are incompetent for not listening to reason, instead listening to such as Nancy Pelosi saying, "We must pass it to see what's in it." And so they did. Now we know what's in it.

But those who crafted Obamacare, they are getting their planned outcome due to their competency? Is it not happening as they planned?
Well the fact that none of them read it before voting yes and based their knowledge of the plan on what Pelosi and Obama told them, I hope everyone of them would be held accountable at the poles. We know that won't happen due to media and the libs who will spin this on repubs somehow and the uniformed lib voters will follow like good little sheep and believe everything they hear on TV, radio, and the paper.

Top
#3371991 - 09/23/13 09:54 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: Wes Parrish]
sgtwebb1
14 Point


Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 9987
Loc: Ooltewah/Harrison TN, USA

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Wes Parrish
Was this "plan's failure" purposefully intended, the "plan" all along, as a means of total government take-over of everything related to healthcare?

I tend to think this might be the case, since most our nation's problems now seem to be purposefully created for the reason of empowering politicians to have something they can then take credit for fixing (as they grow the government bureaucracy), and by the fact that only democrat politicians voted "for" it. Let us not overlook that not a single republican in congress voted for Obamacare --- and those republicans said Day One it was a plan for failure that would greatly harm our economy.



This is the ONLY plan;

overload the system, cause it to fail so that the government can come to the "rescue" and provide the only remaining "solution";

Government funded/provided/rationed healthcare.

It's been the plan all along, straight from the Cloward & Piven playbook.
_________________________
~~Death from above~~
)))---------------->>


Visit my Blog:
Sons of LiberTea Blog

Top
#3372006 - 09/23/13 10:06 PM Re: Is there a "con" man in the oval office? [Re: sgtwebb1]
TNDeerGuy
12 Point


Registered: 11/28/06
Posts: 6097
Loc: Old Hickory/Mt.Juliet, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: sgtwebb1
 Originally Posted By: Wes Parrish
Was this "plan's failure" purposefully intended, the "plan" all along, as a means of total government take-over of everything related to healthcare?

I tend to think this might be the case, since most our nation's problems now seem to be purposefully created for the reason of empowering politicians to have something they can then take credit for fixing (as they grow the government bureaucracy), and by the fact that only democrat politicians voted "for" it. Let us not overlook that not a single republican in congress voted for Obamacare --- and those republicans said Day One it was a plan for failure that would greatly harm our economy.



This is the ONLY plan;

overload the system, cause it to fail so that the government can come to the "rescue" and provide the only remaining "solution";

Government funded/provided/rationed healthcare.

It's been the plan all along, straight from the Cloward & Piven playbook.


Ding, Ding....we have a winner! Everything Obama has done, has been well calculated to do one thing.....destroy our Economy to the point where the only thing left is the government controlling everything—backdoor Socialism/Marxism is what it is. What the narcissist-in-chief has forgotten is that government controlled societies always fail, and the History books will take note of his "accomplishments" and they will not be favorable I hate to inform him—so much for his legacy!
_________________________


Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  Crappie Luck, Tennessee Todd, RUGER, Unicam, stretch, Cuttin Caller, Bobby G, Kimber45 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4105549
RUGER
87048
Deer Assassin
65411
BSK
61041
Crappie Luck
51376
spitndrum
Newest Members
zatoan, DanParchman3, saddleman1, Jculber301, Mik475
13282 Registered Users
Who's Online
111 registered (conwaylale, McBryar32, BuckDropper, 1908_Cubbies, z7x, Chupacabra Killer, 13 invisible) and 132 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
13282 Members
42 Forums
93293 Topics
1089306 Posts

Max Online: 788 @ 11/11/13 08:06 PM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
September
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.086 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.