Tndeer Logo

Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
#3272200 - 06/20/13 05:47 PM Choose which is best in order
Huntr2
Spike


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 56
Loc: West Tenn

Offline
Here are 4 scopes how would you rate them from 1-4 choice on.
Burris C4-4.5-12x42 SF
Minox-Z5-3-15x42
Nikon Monarch-3-12x42
Vortex Viper-4-12x40 PA

Top
#3272215 - 06/20/13 06:15 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Huntr2]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19297
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
I'm certain opinions will vary a good bit regarding this.
These are just mine, and are in part on the magnifications you selected (which would probably differ from what I would select, as would the scopes on the list). My rating is also skewed towards deer hunting, particularly hunting older deer which tend to be more active in low light.

 Originally Posted By: Huntr2
Here are 4 scopes how would you rate them from 1-4 choice on.

Burris C4-4.5-12x42 SF #2 - Mainly because I'm personally biased a bit towards Burris, although this configuration of 4.5-12 is less appealing than say 3-12.

Minox-Z5-3-15x42 #3 - Mainly because in my book this is not a tried & proven brand. The optics "look" great for the money, but will the scope hold up like a Burris? I would also question the usefulness of having 15x with only a 42mm objective. You would like have to decrease the magnification down to about 10-12x for good viewing in low light.

Nikon Monarch-3-12x42 #1 - Mainly because it's been long-term tried & proven. I also prefer the 3-12 power range over say a 4.5-12 range.

Vortex Viper-4-12x40 PA #4 --- I'm sure many are disagreeing with this, but that's where I put it. In part because of the smaller 40mm objective which makes any magnification above 9x less useful in low light (which is typically when older deer are more active, i.e. dawn & dusk).


I will add that for practicality, I prefer no scope objective any larger than 44mm for most of my deer hunting. A 42-44mm objective will perform well at up to 10x magnification in very low light (performs super well at 9x and less magnification). But in the absence of good light, you may find no value in a scope capable of 12x-plus magnification without having a 50mm or larger objective (which I don't want to carry, as it's much like having a grapefruit sitting atop one's gun).

Top
#3272298 - 06/20/13 08:02 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Wes Parrish]
Huntr2
Spike


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 56
Loc: West Tenn

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Wes Parrish
I'm certain opinions will vary a good bit regarding this.
These are just mine, and are in part on the magnifications you selected (which would probably differ from what I would select, as would the scopes on the list). My rating is also skewed towards deer hunting, particularly hunting older deer which tend to be more active in low light.

 Originally Posted By: Huntr2
Here are 4 scopes how would you rate them from 1-4 choice on.

Burris C4-4.5-12x42 SF #2 - Mainly because I'm personally biased a bit towards Burris, although this configuration of 4.5-12 is less appealing than say 3-12.

Minox-Z5-3-15x42 #3 - Mainly because in my book this is not a tried & proven brand. The optics "look" great for the money, but will the scope hold up like a Burris? I would also question the usefulness of having 15x with only a 42mm objective. You would like have to decrease the magnification down to about 10-12x for good viewing in low light.

Nikon Monarch-3-12x42 #1 - Mainly because it's been long-term tried & proven. I also prefer the 3-12 power range over say a 4.5-12 range.

Vortex Viper-4-12x40 PA #4 --- I'm sure many are disagreeing with this, but that's where I put it. In part because of the smaller 40mm objective which makes any magnification above 9x less useful in low light (which is typically when older deer are more active, i.e. dawn & dusk).


I will add that for practicality, I prefer no scope objective any larger than 44mm for most of my deer hunting. A 42-44mm objective will perform well at up to 10x magnification in very low light (performs super well at 9x and less magnification). But in the absence of good light, you may find no value in a scope capable of 12x-plus magnification without having a 50mm or larger objective (which I don't want to carry, as it's much like having a grapefruit sitting atop one's gun).



I am setting up a long range deer rifle. What would you suggest?

Top
#3272311 - 06/20/13 08:19 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Huntr2]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19297
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Huntr2
I am setting up a long range deer rifle. What would you suggest?

Doesn't change my thoughts.

Not sure what anyone means when they say "long range", but let's say you're talking 300 yards. A 10x scope provides you with the visual effect of 30 yards. Most archers consider a 30-yard shot reasonable with no magnification. Just saying I consider 10x very adequate out to 300 yards. In fact, a maximum magnification of 10x would have little to do with the probability of "making" even a 500-yard shot imo, since 500 yards would appear as 50.

Another consideration is the possibility of a "close range" shot even when you're expecting a long-range shot. This is one reason I would prefer to have less magnification than what could be most ideal for "long range".

Although not among the listed options, some scopes are now offering a much wider range of magnification, such as the Leupold VX-6. Consider that one in 2-12 x 42mm and we might be talking the best of most worlds for deer hunting.

There was a recent thread devoted to the Leupold VX-6:
http://www.tndeer.com/tndeertalk/ubbthre...&gonew=1#UNREAD

That's what I would suggest. \:\)

Top
#3272325 - 06/20/13 08:41 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Wes Parrish]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19297
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
By the way, over the years, while hunting with a very long-range accurate rifle, the gun capable of killing a deer well beyond 600 yards, and topped with a maximum magnification of a 10x scope . . . . .

Most of my shooting opportunities over 200 yards have been passed simply because of my lack of shooting skills, and my ability to recognize the low probabilities of making a clean kill when the opportunity is fleeting, and the deer is moving.

A lack of magnification over 10x has contributed virtually nothing to the probability of making a shot under 300 yards. However, I have failed to pull the trigger on rutting bucks that ran under my tree while I was "expecting" a 200-yard shot, had my scope set on 10x, and couldn't make an otherwise easy close-range shot (something much less likely to happen with less magnification, wide field of view).

Top
#3272396 - 06/20/13 09:49 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Wes Parrish]
Kimberman
10 Point


Registered: 10/30/05
Posts: 3499
Loc: Knoxville

Offline
My order would be a bit different. I own the Minox 3-15, and its one of my favorite scopes. It would be the hands down first choice out of the ones you mentioned.

#2 would be the Vortex Viper. I have looked through more than a few of these, my hunting partner uses one, and likes it. They are good quality glass that gives you a lot for the $.

#3 would be the Nikon Monarch. To be fair I haven't looked through the newer version, but I have had an older version for years, and its been a rock solid performer for me.

#4 would be the Burris. I have no clue about the quality level of the C4 series. Burris is a reputable name, and I have or have had a few Fullfields in my life. They are a good scope, but they have always seemed mediocre compared to a bunch of other scopes in the same price range to me.


A scope you may want to include on your list is the Sightron S2 Big Sky 3-12x42. I have one of those and a 3-9x42. They are great glass that doesn't get a lot of attention. I would put it #1 or #2 if it were on your list.
_________________________
So many smallmouth, so little time.

Top
#3272449 - 06/20/13 10:40 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Kimberman]
TNRifleman
8 Point


Registered: 01/06/08
Posts: 1418
Loc: Collierville

Offline
#1 Minox - To me, it is the only one on the list with optics approaching Zeiss quality
#2 Vortex Viper - Low light perofrmance exceeds Monarch to me
#3 Monarch - Have owned 7 of these and they work great but I feel the other two out perform Monarch's at first and last light
#4 Burris - Would never buy another Burris due to porr customer service experience

Top
#3272467 - 06/21/13 12:55 AM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: TNRifleman]
Model70Man
12 Point


Registered: 09/30/05
Posts: 6784
Loc: Knoxville, TN

Offline
All of the scopes would be a good choice. I have owned all except the Burris. The Minox is by far the best out of the 4, followed by the Vortex Viper, Nikon Monarch, and the Burris.

I would also look at the Weaver Super Slam, Sightron SII Big Sky, or a Meopta Meopro.
_________________________
Winchester Model 70 Stainless Left Hand .270 Win.
McMillan Edge
Talley Lightweights
Zeiss Victory Varipoint #60 Illuminated

Top
#3272548 - 06/21/13 07:08 AM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Model70Man]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 19297
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Model70Man
The Minox is by far the best out of the 4 . . . . .

I totally agree in terms of the optical quality of the glass and the range of magnification (which is part of why that Minox generally commands a higher purchase price than the other 3 listed).

But each of us may have a balance of factors in determining what's "best" for our personal circumstances. Part of that equation (for me) is long-term "reliability" (which also effects confidence and faith in one's set-up anytime afield). Another part of that equation is purchase price. (Hey, if price didn't matter, doubt any of those 4 scopes listed by Huntr2 would have been on his list.) And for some, the finish options (matte, gloss, special camo pattern, silver) of the scope might weigh heavily into the equation.

Not suggesting Minox is unreliable, and everyone using them seems to be favorably impressed. Just saying I personally have more faith in the Nikon and Burris lines to hold up over time under heavy recoil and use, and that weighs heavily into my choice of "best".
 Originally Posted By: Model70Man
All of the scopes would be a good choice.

x 2

Top
#3273025 - 06/21/13 03:33 PM Re: Choose which is best in order [Re: Wes Parrish]
woodchuckc
8 Point


Registered: 02/09/05
Posts: 1801
Loc: Hickman County, TN

Offline
I have the Minox Z5, Nikon, and a Vortex (but not that model). My opinion:
Of those three, the Minox wins hands down over the Nikon, but both are fine scopes. The Voxtex is a step down from those two, but is still an acceptable choice. I have never had a Burris so I can't comment on that one.

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  RUGER, gtk, Bobby G, Unicam, CBU93, stretch, TurkeyBurd, Kimber45, Mrs.Unicam, Crappie Luck 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4105533
RUGER
87010
Deer Assassin
65411
BSK
61027
Crappie Luck
51376
spitndrum
Newest Members
Mik475, AaronB, Bad Wolf, jw3783, Jesse91
13278 Registered Users
Who's Online
101 registered (Fence Post, walker, redheadshooter, peytoncreekhunter, MUP, David Sapp, 19 invisible) and 116 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
13278 Members
42 Forums
93166 Topics
1088267 Posts

Max Online: 788 @ 11/11/13 08:06 PM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
September
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.106 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.