Tndeer Logo

Page 4 of 9 « First<23456>Last »
Topic Options
#3163355 - 02/14/13 01:44 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: John Harris]
BamaProud
12 Point


Registered: 04/03/11
Posts: 6623
Loc: Shelby County, TN

Offline
Approved by a House subcommittee after a six-minute hearing.

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2013/feb/13/tennessee-house-panel-advances-guns-bill-after-6-m/
_________________________
Save the Little ones for the Little Ones.
Wine-Down Brewing and Winemaking

Top
#3163368 - 02/14/13 04:39 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: Bone Collector]
MUP
Non-Typical


Registered: 08/01/07
Posts: 44263
Loc: Just North of Chatt-town

content Online
Ya know, I've been reading and reading along with this thread, and something just came to me. This shouldn't even be an issue to start with imo, but, seems to me, that the ones who think businesses should be allowed to stop citizens from exercising their 2nd A right on their property, are in the same boat as the govt they're complaining about in the first place...restricting the citizens right to keep and bear arms in the first place. Sure, keeping your employees from drinking and smoking can easily fall into the rules and regs for any business...but just seems that any constitutionally minded employer wouldn't have to even think about restricting a constitutional right of his employee(s). In a nutshell(trying anyway ) I believe that when an employer is hiring citizens to work for his company, he's asking the public to come onto his property for the purpose of employment, mutually beneficial for both parties, and shouldn't restrict their right to keep and bear arms...although again, he/she would have that right I do believe, he/she would also be more of a liberal mind than of a conservative one, ie govt minded. JMO FWIW
_________________________
MUP

Amateurs: Built the Ark

Professionals: Built the Titanic

Top
#3163581 - 02/14/13 08:17 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: MUP]
-DRM-
6 Point


Registered: 08/21/12
Posts: 768
Loc: Spring Hill, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: MUP
I believe that when an employer is hiring citizens to work for his company, he's asking the public to come onto his property for the purpose of employment, mutually beneficial for both parties, and shouldn't restrict their right to keep and bear arms...although again, he/she would have that right I do believe, he/she would also be more of a liberal mind than of a conservative one, ie govt minded. JMO FWIW


Wow...

So because you want to force a property owner - by power of the government - to let you bring something on to THEIR property...

your position is conservative.

And because I want the government to stay OUT of this, and let property owners control their own property rights...

my position is liberal?


Some of you truly amaze me with the lies you are willing to tell yourself to get what you want.
_________________________
~DRM~

Top
#3163583 - 02/14/13 08:19 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: -DRM-]
-DRM-
6 Point


Registered: 08/21/12
Posts: 768
Loc: Spring Hill, TN

Offline
So John, you admit the bill does not protect an employee from being fired. It ONLY covers permit holders (so much for this being a freedom issue), along with half a dozen other problems with the wording...

Why are you not advocating that this bill be pulled on principle alone?
_________________________
~DRM~

Top
#3163601 - 02/14/13 08:40 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: -DRM-]
John Harris
4 Point


Registered: 09/04/03
Posts: 282
Loc: Nashville

Offline
 Originally Posted By: -DRM-
So John, you admit the bill does not protect an employee from being fired. It ONLY covers permit holders (so much for this being a freedom issue), along with half a dozen other problems with the wording...

Why are you not advocating that this bill be pulled on principle alone?


I am trying to persuade legislators and enlist the support of other voters to understand that the bill has serious flaws and should be addressed before they rush to make it law.

On the property rights issue, I wrestled with that myself. I have considered the federal appellate cases which specifically looked at that issue (a case called Ramsey Winch) after the law was passed in Oklahoma about 6 years ago. The federal government found that this is a balancing a rights (real property rights, personal property rights (i.e., the contents of the car), and self-defense/2nd Amendment rights) and that there is not a material or unconstitutional violation of any real property rights or even a "taking" because any infringement is minimal to non-existent. That same opinion was adopted by the Tennessee Attorney General in 2012 when the Senate Judiciary asked for a review of the proposed legislation then.

In addition, the court of appeals noted that real property rights (particularly commercial/business property) are actually heavily regulated with zoning, land use, aesthetics, ADA, and other government infringements.

The court also noted that since most states adopt a civilian carry law at least with the belief or statement that allowing citizens to carry firearms has a proven deterrent effect on generalized and specific crime, that such laws also fall within the state's police powers. Thus, allowing a private property owner to "nullify" a police power of the state was seen as unwarranted under the law just as a property owner could not declare rape or murder laws "void" on their properties.
_________________________
John Harris
_________________________________
Attorney &
Executive Director, Tennessee Firearms Association
both of which support my hunting interests.

Top
#3163611 - 02/14/13 08:46 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: -DRM-]
MUP
Non-Typical


Registered: 08/01/07
Posts: 44263
Loc: Just North of Chatt-town

content Online
 Originally Posted By: -DRM-
 Originally Posted By: MUP
I believe that when an employer is hiring citizens to work for his company, he's asking the public to come onto his property for the purpose of employment, mutually beneficial for both parties, and shouldn't restrict their right to keep and bear arms...although again, he/she would have that right I do believe, he/she would also be more of a liberal mind than of a conservative one, ie govt minded. JMO FWIW


Wow...

So because you want to force a property owner - by power of the government - to let you bring something on to THEIR property...

your position is conservative.

And because I want the government to stay OUT of this, and let property owners control their own property rights...

my position is liberal?


Some of you truly amaze me with the lies you are willing to tell yourself to get what you want.


I'm not trying to force anybody to do anything. If you'll read my post you will see that I said it's their right to do whatever they wish. But, if they deny their employees the right to keep and bear arms on their property, they are essentially doing just as the govt, overriding the Constitution. I just think, that if someone is preaching constitutionality, then saying that citizens can't exercise their 2A right at their place of business, as an employee, it's hypocritical.
_________________________
MUP

Amateurs: Built the Ark

Professionals: Built the Titanic

Top
#3163661 - 02/14/13 09:15 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: MUP]
-DRM-
6 Point


Registered: 08/21/12
Posts: 768
Loc: Spring Hill, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: MUP
I'm not trying to force anybody to do anything.


If you support a law such as the one above, yes - you are forcing a property owner to do something he does not want to do with his property.

 Quote:
But, if they deny their employees the right to keep and bear arms on their property,


Yet again, you seem confused as to what the Constitution and Amendments actually are.

They are a contract between YOU and your GOVERNMENT.
They are NOT a contract between you and a property owner.

Simply put: a property owner is not and can not "deny the right to keep and bear arms" - as no such right exists in the relationship between you and that property owner.

This is basic concept stuff here, yet so many people are confused about it.

Even if it were an applicable concept, it is still a flawed view in that you are not being FORCED to be on their property in the first place. If you are not forced to be on their property, it is absurd to claim they forced you to be on their property unarmed.

Again, this is basic concept stuff here people... not rocket science.
_________________________
~DRM~

Top
#3163671 - 02/14/13 09:24 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: John Harris]
-DRM-
6 Point


Registered: 08/21/12
Posts: 768
Loc: Spring Hill, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: John Harris

On the property rights issue, I wrestled with that myself. I have considered the federal appellate cases which specifically looked at that issue (a case called Ramsey Winch) after the law was passed in Oklahoma about 6 years ago. The federal government found that this is a balancing a rights (real property rights, personal property rights (i.e., the contents of the car), and self-defense/2nd Amendment rights) and that there is not a material or unconstitutional violation of any real property rights or even a "taking" because any infringement is minimal to non-existent. That same opinion was adopted by the Tennessee Attorney General in 2012 when the Senate Judiciary asked for a review of the proposed legislation then.

In addition, the court of appeals noted that real property rights (particularly commercial/business property) are actually heavily regulated with zoning, land use, aesthetics, ADA, and other government infringements.

The court also noted that since most states adopt a civilian carry law at least with the belief or statement that allowing citizens to carry firearms has a proven deterrent effect on generalized and specific crime, that such laws also fall within the state's police powers. Thus, allowing a private property owner to "nullify" a police power of the state was seen as unwarranted under the law just as a property owner could not declare rape or murder laws "void" on their properties.


With all due respect, John - what this says to me is you wrestled with it until you found enough legal-ease and court cases to justify what you *want*, even though in your heart you know what I am saying is true: You are forcing a property owner to give up their rights to control their property so you can get what you want, by force of the government.

And to be clear - forcing a property owner to give up their rights by force of the government is sometimes a necessity... eminent domain being one such example. But in this case - I think there are other solutions that do not trample on the rights of property owners.

Providing legal protections for property owners - included in this bill - is a GOOD step that does not trample on rights.

Removing criminal charges from the equation when someone has a gun on someone else's property, and leaving the property owner with the same recourse I have were you to bring a gun on to my property - I can ask you to leave... that would be a GOOD step that does not take away anyone's rights.

Creating a law that employers would have to PROVE you had a gun on their property for them to terminate you with cause - that would be a good step that does not take away anyone's rights.

My point is - there are other ways to skin this cat that don't involve stripping a property owner of control of their own property.
_________________________
~DRM~

Top
#3163676 - 02/14/13 09:29 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: -DRM-]
MUP
Non-Typical


Registered: 08/01/07
Posts: 44263
Loc: Just North of Chatt-town

content Online
The company and the employee have an agreement for employment. I still don't see why there is an issue with the employees carrying in the first place. Again, they(the co.) absolutely have the right to do as they please concerning their property, but I just don't see why any business would actually deny that constitutional right to begin with. Not a question of forcing anyone to do anything. Oh, and on the bill that just passed, it shouldn't have come to this in the first place imo.
_________________________
MUP

Amateurs: Built the Ark

Professionals: Built the Titanic

Top
#3163686 - 02/14/13 09:38 AM Re: Tennessee Senate approves guns-in-parking-lots bil [Re: MUP]
TNGunsmoke
8 Point


Registered: 09/07/11
Posts: 1343
Loc: Jackson,TN

Offline
I don't know about every employer, but I do know the reasoning where I work for why employees are denied their carry rights. Several years ago, they had a supervisor who had a carry permit, and used the sidearm on his waist to intimidate the guys working under him. He was reprimanded, and policy was then changed to disallow the carry of arms while at work. As far as them being in your parked vehicle on their lot, it is prohibited, but it is don't ask don't tell and as long as their isn't a problem, as far as they are concerned, it isn't there.
_________________________
You can't fix stupid.....

Top
Page 4 of 9 « First<23456>Last »


Moderator:  RUGER, Unicam, gtk, Tennessee Todd, Lakeland Charlie, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, TurkeyBurd, MAN, Bobby G, Kimber45, Crappie Luck 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4105169
RUGER
86615
Deer Assassin
65013
BSK
60838
Crappie Luck
51376
spitndrum
Newest Members
Shouldbeatwork, Tage, Horsefly23, jthisell, pacecardave
13187 Registered Users
Who's Online
98 registered (THE DUKE, gobblegrunt, Roost 1, JACO0334, MUP, 280longshot, 12 invisible) and 106 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
13187 Members
42 Forums
91026 Topics
1063783 Posts

Max Online: 788 @ 11/11/13 08:06 PM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
August
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.045 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.