Tndeer Logo

Page all of 2 12>
Topic Options
#3145431 - 01/30/13 10:43 AM Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges?
preds1
12 Point


Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 6463
Loc: Sumner County

Offline

CONNERSVILLE, Ind.

Jeff Counceller says a dying fawn he found on someone's porch three years ago surely wouldn't have lived had he and his wife not nursed it back to health on their eastern Indiana farm. The Connersville police officer insists they had no clue that they could be breaking the law.

The couple's good deed put them at odds with the state Department of Natural Resources, and prosecutors earlier this month charged Jeff and Jennifer Counceller with illegal possession of a white-tailed deer, a misdemeanor that carries up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine.

Counceller said they plan to fight the charges, even though it might be cheaper and easier to just pay the fine. If their burgeoning legion of online supporters is any indication, public opinion is very much on the couple's side.

Counceller told The Indianapolis Star that he found the deer in 2010 curled up on a front porch with maggot-infested puncture wounds, so he brought it back to his family's 17-acre farm to try to save it. The couple named the fawn Dani and kept it in a fenced enclosure.

Jeff Counceller said he and his wife didn't know it was illegal to keep the deer, and that returning it to the wild when they were told to do so "would have been a death sentence."

A probable cause affidavit said Jennifer Counceller told a conservation officer that she eventually realized she needed a permit to keep the deer, but didn't contact officials because she realized they would "put it down."

Jeff Counceller didn't immediately respond to a Tuesday phone message left by The Associated Press seeking comment. Jennifer Counceller's voicemail wasn't accepting new messages.

DNR spokesman Lt. Bill Browne said the agency had received a lot of phone calls and email about the charges, but he declined to comment about the case and instead referred the AP to the agency's claims in the court documents.

The deer's story went viral online this week after a sympathetic Indianapolis man, John Waudby, set up a Facebook page to rally support for the Councellers.

"I heard about it early Saturday morning when I got home," said Waudby, a 41-year-old warehouse worker. "I saw it on the news and was outraged. I was like, you've got to be kidding me."

"They're not criminals. They were trying to do the right thing," he added.

The Facebook page, "Drop Charges Against Connersville Police Officer," had more than 15,000 "likes" by mid-afternoon Tuesday and was growing by about 1,000 an hour. Waudby said he had hoped to reach perhaps 1,000 local people to put pressure on prosecutors to drop the charges, but was receiving responses from as far away as Argentina and Australia. He was also circulating an online petition and by noon, the petition had topped 8,000 signatures. More than 135 people had signed up online to attend the Councellers' trial on March 7 in Fayette County.

"It's like a wildfire that you just can't stop at this point," Waudby said, adding that he's only slept for about 10 hours, total, in the three days since launching his online campaign.

The Councellers said they had intended to release the deer once it was strong enough to survive on its own. They tried to find it a home at animal rescue operations, petting zoos and deer farms, but no one would take it. According to court records, Jeff Counceller texted a conservation officer and urged DNR not to kill the deer, saying ""it's not the deer's fault."

Last summer, the deer vanished on the day that the DNR planned to euthanize it, following the denial of the couple's request for a rescue permit.

The DNR website includes a section on wildlife rehabilitation that warns people who find wild animals to make sure they are really abandoned and if they are, to contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitator. The closest rehabilitators to Connersville are in neighboring Wayne County, according to a list on the website.

"Removing wildlife from the environment is prohibited by state regulations without a proper handling permit," the DNR website warns, adding that most young animals that appear to be abandoned don't require help. "Wildlife can carry diseases and parasites that can be transmitted to humans, it is best to leave them alone," the website adds.

Kathleen Hershey, president of Utopia Wildlife, a wildlife rehabilitation center near Hope in south-central Indiana, said even though the Councellers meant well, it's bad for a deer to become acclimated to humans because they can become too trusting and easy prey for hunters.

"They have real serious social needs, and you can't just raise a deer. ... They have to be in with others of their kind," she said. "It has to learn how to live in a herd and that's where its safety is."

Most of the Facebook posts expressed disbelief that the couple could face charges for what was perceived as a good deed, but some comments weren't so sympathetic.

One post pointed out that the couple had exposed themselves, their children and their pets to disease carried by deer, and that the local deer population could be infected now that the animal is free.

Although lawyer's fees would be more expensive than paying the fine, the Councellers said they plan to fight the charge.

"Sometimes, it's not always about the DNR laws," Jennifer Counceller told the Star. "Sometimes it's about common sense and what's right in God's eyes. And that's what I'm going to stand for."

Waudby said he plans to attend the Councellers' court hearings, "and I'm bringing thousands of people with me."

Top
#3145441 - 01/30/13 10:48 AM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: preds1]
Grizzly Johnson
Team Grizzly
16 Point


Registered: 10/07/08
Posts: 15393
Loc: Tennessee

Offline
I think based on the thought behind what this started from.... the time and money wasted persuing this could have been better spent on catching poachers or something else more pressing.
_________________________
But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Top
#3145453 - 01/30/13 10:58 AM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: Grizzly Johnson]
Mossy Oak
8 Point


Registered: 01/03/05
Posts: 2436
Loc: Montgomery Co.

Offline
Interesting story. No way a jury would convict though. Once they saw a picture of the little fawn, the jury panel would be out to hang the prosecutor.
_________________________
Mossy Oak ProStaff

Team Release and Catch Bowfishing

http://www.dirtnapgear.com/


Top
#3145520 - 01/30/13 11:59 AM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: Mossy Oak]
44fanatic
12 Point


Registered: 01/01/08
Posts: 6126
Loc: Clarksville, Montgomery Cnty

Offline
Ignorance is no excuse for violating the law. Max out the fines and jail time is what I say...J/K. The legal action should be followed up on. Minimize any penalties and use this as an opportunity to educate everyone on wildlife and the laws pertaining to.
_________________________
Bill

Top
#3145531 - 01/30/13 12:08 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: 44fanatic]
WRbowhunter
8 Point


Registered: 02/22/10
Posts: 1617
Loc: collierville,tn

Offline
did not know we can pick and choose which laws to break.
_________________________
"Vegetarians are cool. All I eat are vegetarians"-Ted Nugent

Top
#3145533 - 01/30/13 12:08 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: 44fanatic]
Diehard Hunter
CRAMP
12 Point


Registered: 08/01/08
Posts: 6868
Loc: East Tennessee

Offline
So lets get this straight....a POLICE OFFICER wants an exception because he had good intentions? He is using ignorance of the law as an excuse? They ignored the DNR when they were told to return the deer to the wild!

I wonder how many good intention stories he gets daily from the perps he is talking too. Does he decide which laws he will enforce and which he will not?

Sorry buddy. You broke the law, you knew you were breaking it, now pay up.
_________________________
The recreational value of a game animal is inverse to the artificiality of its origin and the intensiveness of the management system that produced it. Aldo Leopold


Top
#3145536 - 01/30/13 12:12 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: Diehard Hunter]
Unicam Administrator
Grumpaw
16 Point


Registered: 12/13/00
Posts: 19421
Loc: Dallas, GA. & Cookeville, TN

Offline
Good story, doubt anyone will ever know the real story.
_________________________
"Gun Free Zones are for VICTIMS!"

John 15:13

Top
#3145591 - 01/30/13 12:47 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: Unicam]
Backwudz
8 Point


Registered: 11/28/11
Posts: 1347
Loc: Jefferson County, Tn

Offline
DEMOCRATS .....turned 'em in (JMO)
_________________________
If some people could read my mind, I'd get punched in the face a lot!
Women have cleaner minds than men, they change theirs all the time!

Top
#3145676 - 01/30/13 01:33 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: Backwudz]
waynesworld
8 Point


Registered: 05/13/12
Posts: 1482
Loc: Mboro, Tennessee

Offline
Diehard I think they were told not to release it

Last summer, the deer vanished on the day that the DNR planned to euthanize it, following the denial of the couple's request for a rescue permit.

The fact is yes the police officer committed a crime. But the prosecution has some leeway to what level they prosecute. I would guess they are ticked because the deer vanished when DNR planned to euthanize it.

The funny thing is this crap is so distracting to the whole big picture of game management and the legal system. The whole thing probably could have been resolved a lot easier with cooler heads.

Top
#3145682 - 01/30/13 01:36 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: waynesworld]
Diehard Hunter
CRAMP
12 Point


Registered: 08/01/08
Posts: 6868
Loc: East Tennessee

Offline
 Originally Posted By: waynesworld
Diehard I think they were told not to release it

Last summer, the deer vanished on the day that the DNR planned to euthanize it, following the denial of the couple's request for a rescue permit.

The fact is yes the police officer committed a crime. But the prosecution has some leeway to what level they prosecute. I would guess they are ticked because the deer vanished when DNR planned to euthanize it.

The funny thing is this crap is so distracting to the whole big picture of game management and the legal system. The whole thing probably could have been resolved a lot easier with cooler heads.


"Jeff Counceller said he and his wife didn't know it was illegal to keep the deer, and that returning it to the wild when they were told to do so
"would have been a death sentence.""
_________________________
The recreational value of a game animal is inverse to the artificiality of its origin and the intensiveness of the management system that produced it. Aldo Leopold


Top
#3145728 - 01/30/13 01:59 PM Re: Guilty, Innocent or Drop Charges? [Re: Diehard Hunter]
birddog
12 Point


Registered: 02/21/02
Posts: 6519
Loc: Seymour, TN

Offline
Pay the fine and move on.
Top
Page all of 2 12>


Moderator:  RUGER, Unicam, gtk, Tennessee Todd, Lakeland Charlie, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, TurkeyBurd, MAN, Bobby G, Kimber45, Crappie Luck 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4105861
RUGER
87563
Deer Assassin
65614
BSK
61366
Crappie Luck
51376
spitndrum
Newest Members
buckslayer85, crose84, Fisher 1959, AKeys, GUIDO
13383 Registered Users
Who's Online
172 registered (stik, RobbyW, Bradleyb, m_allison71, BallisticV, chip, 18 invisible) and 232 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
13383 Members
42 Forums
95683 Topics
1120055 Posts

Max Online: 788 @ 11/11/13 08:06 PM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
October
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.05 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.