Tndeer Logo

Page 2 of 6 <12345>Last »
Topic Options
#3048979 - 11/25/12 11:33 PM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: Swamphunter]
catman529
spiderboy
16 Point


Registered: 11/10/10
Posts: 15123
Loc: Franklin TN

Offline
harvesting - reaping the food that has been sown

foraging - taking food growing in the wild

hunting - killing an animal that is smarter than most human vegetarians.
_________________________
Team Run 'N Gunners

Top
#3049038 - 11/26/12 04:07 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: catman529]
cbcs1987
4 Point


Registered: 02/27/08
Posts: 361
Loc: east

Offline
I cringe when I hear the word harvest when applied to hunting or gardening.my neighbor is from Pennsylvania. She doesn't say she picks tomatoes out of a garden. She harvest them haha. Same goes for deer hunting. You don't harvest a deer.you harvest a20 acre soybean field,IMO
Top
#3049055 - 11/26/12 05:06 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: Poser]
Buzzard Breath
8 Point


Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 1514
Loc: East

Offline
Go to the "Quality Deer Management" forum and tell me that what they are doing is all that different than raising vegetables.

I use the term harvest when I'm implying that I further used the animal. Big game and small game alike. I use the word kill when I go on and further explain how I went ahead and processed it.

I think hunters judging hunters for the way they talk has a far more detrimental effect than the terminology they use when explaining their final actions of a hunt. Someone has previously suggested that I take up tennis because I'm a mamby pamby for using the word harvest. I guess they figure only big truck driving, tobacco spitting, manly men are the only people who should be tough enough to go out and do some killing. That would really help with hunter recruitment. We have much bigger problems facing the future of hunting than the words we use to explain the outcome.

And "yes", I am concerned about what the 80% of the voting population that doesn't have strong feelings for or against hunting think, so it is partly me being politically correct. They are the ones who will ultimately decide the fate of hunting.
_________________________
Longbeards Inc.

Top
#3049085 - 11/26/12 05:54 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: Buzzard Breath]
thebeard
Spike


Registered: 11/06/07
Posts: 80
Loc: tn, usa

Offline
Buzz mcmanus I think you are spot on here. Im more than a little bit surprised by posers and many others on heres response to the word harvest. I use it myself when I refer to all game annimals I put on the table. I kill rats in a trap I harvest my meat....
Top
#3049110 - 11/26/12 06:27 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: thebeard]
Bottom Hunter
16 Point


Registered: 12/29/06
Posts: 16297
Loc: Hatchie Bottoms

Offline
I too use the term harvest, but not all the time...I think that people know what you mean when you say harvest or kill.

I'm wondering what gives any hunter the right to tell another hunter what terminology to use...

There are lots of terminology out there, in regards to deer....such as buck, doe, spike, button, yearling, nanner head, pig, wallhanger, booner, slick head, pope and young, brute,and so forth.
And as for KILL, here's a few...Dropped the Hammer, Put the smack down on him, dropped one, shot, arrowed, laid one down, etc and so forth, you get my point.

What does it matter what someone calls an animal or the act of taking it's life?

When you pick fruit or vegetables, do you not kill them? Are they not alive at time of harvest? Did they not eat , breathe and grow just prior to you harvesting them? then why not call it killing a field of corn or cotton....?

The point is simply......I have read this exact thread every year, sometimes more than once a year, since I joined here and I still have no understanding as to why people care that a hunter calls it harvesting.....did someone demand that YOU call it harvesting? I'm thinking..NO.

Once again, the overreacting of the masses leads to unnecessary anger and frustration.

I plan to harvest a nice buck this week. Anyone else plan to kill one? See, that wasn't too hard to swallow, now was it??

enjoy


Edited by Bottom Hunter (11/26/12 06:29 AM)
_________________________
There are some people who always seem angry and continuously look for conflict.

Walk away; the battle they are fighting is not with you, but with themselves.

Top
#3049130 - 11/26/12 06:41 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: thebeard]
BigGameGuy
TWRA Biologist
12 Point


Registered: 05/14/04
Posts: 6580
Loc: Nashville

Offline
Here's another angle...

First off, I have no problem when people tell me what they killed. As hunters, that's the end-product of what we do. But I think Buzz makes a great point. We need to look at the big picture and how hunting fits into society today. Unfortunately we can't afford to be an in-your-face that's how-we-roll kinda crowd. As Buzz pointed out, there's 80% of the folks out there that don't care what we do. If they start caring because they get offended we'll have a whole lot more to worry about than just what word we use when we kill a deer. The best thing to do is be mindful of who you're speaking to. Anyhow, here is our (TWRA) justification...

As an Agency, TWRA is mandated by the legislature that we only allow "surplus" animals to be hunted. We are never to allow our resources to be negatively impacted unless their is sufficient cause. Therefore, in the big-picture we tend to look at our resources as a crop. In other words, what can we "harvest" so that there is ample seed for next years crop? This is why we produce harvest reports, to reiterate the taking of the surplus animals.

"And Yes, Representative _________, my Dad killed a nice 8-point this year. That was part of the overall harvest in your county."

Just be mindful of the crowd.
_________________________
If given the choice between education and regulation, I'll choose education every time.

Top
#3049137 - 11/26/12 06:47 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: BigGameGuy]
Bottom Hunter
16 Point


Registered: 12/29/06
Posts: 16297
Loc: Hatchie Bottoms

Offline
 Originally Posted By: BigGameGuy
Here's another angle...

First off, I have no problem when people tell me what they killed. As hunters, that's the end-product of what we do. But I think Buzz makes a great point. We need to look at the big picture and how hunting fits into society today. Unfortunately we can't afford to be an in-your-face that's how-we-roll kinda crowd. As Buzz pointed out, there's 80% of the folks out there that don't care what we do. If they start caring because they get offended we'll have a whole lot more to worry about than just what word we use when we kill a deer. The best thing to do is be mindful of who you're speaking to. Anyhow, here is our (TWRA) justification...

As an Agency, TWRA is mandated by the legislature that we only allow "surplus" animals to be hunted. We are never to allow our resources to be negatively impacted unless their is sufficient cause. Therefore, in the big-picture we tend to look at our resources as a crop. In other words, what can we "harvest" so that there is ample seed for next years crop? This is why we produce harvest reports, to reiterate the taking of the surplus animals.

"And Yes, Representative _________, my Dad killed a nice 8-point this year. That was part of the overall harvest in your county."

Just be mindful of the crowd.



I agree. The sad part is that with most any activity, some people can not just be happy with their right to pursue whatever it is that they desire. They have to tell you about it and tell you that they do not care what you think about it....

let's all just be happy that we have this right to hunt and stop poking the hornet nest...lol.
_________________________
There are some people who always seem angry and continuously look for conflict.

Walk away; the battle they are fighting is not with you, but with themselves.

Top
#3049263 - 11/26/12 08:26 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: Bottom Hunter]
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical


Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 64227
Loc: Nashville, TN

Offline
I use the word "harvest" when discussing herd biology, because it is the correct biological term. But I have no problem with using the word "kill" when I'm talking about what I killed or a group of hunters killed. I don't use the word "harvest" to be politically correct, I use it to be biological correct.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan

"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James

Top
#3049319 - 11/26/12 08:51 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: BSK]
W.Seay
14 Point


Registered: 01/17/06
Posts: 7992
Loc: Collierville,TN.

Offline
My mouth wont say the words harvest or bagged when talking about deer! I kill deer and I dont care who thinks what about it!!!
_________________________
To one with faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible.

Top
#3049354 - 11/26/12 09:15 AM Re: Its killing not "Harvesting" [Re: Bottom Hunter]
Poser
Mud Dauber
16 Point


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 11880
Loc: Tennessee

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Bottom Hunter


What does it matter what someone calls an animal or the act of taking it's life?


enjoy


Again, it has to do with the way in which we think about hunting. A young hunters grows up hearing nothing but euphemisms ("harvest") and slang ("meat missile", "Dirt Nap", "Lung butter" etc) with regards to the discussion of death and the act of killing. In fact, a young hunter today may never hear much less use the term "kill" to describe anything to do with the act of hunting. Are you telling me that this language does not condition a hunter's thought process over time?

One other thing to add. If we can all agree that the use of this term originates from TV shows, I would bet my bottom dollar that the use of this term was heavily pushed by the producers and sponsors of the shows. That being the case, it is clearly an agenda. Its not about "throwing" it someone's face, its just that every time someone publicly uses the word "harvest", the word "killing" begins to take on a different meaning in relation. At some point further down the road, this will make hunting easier to criticize: "Hunters know what they are doing is wrong, they can't even use the word "kill" in the same sentence as "hunt." I'm not telling anyone what to do, what words to use, or even criticizing anyone, just pointing out that hiding behind language is a slippery slope and if the word "harvest" is so benign, ask the question why are many so quick to defend its exclusive use as a replacement for "killing"?
_________________________
It doesn't have to be fun to be fun.

Wild & crazy, can't be stopped. Only the strong will survive.

Keep your knife sharp and your skillet greasy.

http://www.GoCarnivore.com

Top
Page 2 of 6 <12345>Last »


Moderator:  RUGER, Tennessee Todd, Unicam, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, Bobby G, Outdoor Lady, TurkeyBurd, Kimber45, Kirk, Crappie Luck 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4104340
RUGER
85527
Deer Assassin
64227
BSK
59485
Crappie Luck
51368
spitndrum
Newest Members
Amy pesterfield, Blood seeker, fghijk604245, top_of_the_foodchain, infantryleadtheway
13288 Registered Users
Who's Online
86 registered (Gravey, leader, Hunt 365, old buck 171, Labboy, Mudbone, 12 invisible) and 206 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
13288 Members
42 Forums
85375 Topics
1031632 Posts

Max Online: 788 @ 11/11/13 08:06 PM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.233 seconds in which 0.003 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.