#2000964 - 07/20/10 03:29 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: turkeyhunter64]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
What the studies have shown is that removing ("culling") bucks with smaller antlers does not positively affect the antlers of future bucks in the area. In fact, removing bucks for no other reason than antler size often has a detrmental affect long-term. All you are doing is removing future mature bucks that would have had a positive influence on the herd, regardless of their antler size.
As for how many does a buck breeds, on average it is less than 1 per year. Many bucks do no breeding at all.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2000976 - 07/20/10 03:49 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BSK]
|
Tomahawk
6 Point
Registered: 07/11/10
Posts: 762
Loc: east & west tn
|
Offline
|
|
As for how many does a buck breeds, on average it is less than 1 per year. Many bucks do no breeding at all. I can believe that. Like I have said I have a couple of spots with only 1-2 "breeding" does, with 2-3 fawns. On average at least 4 bucks show up b/w Nov 3rd-Nov20th. Even though they all seem to hang around for a few days, I would suspect that only one is actually doing the breeding and the others are satellites just waiting for their chance to move in. Not bad move on their part because if there is a mature in the mix or just a nice racked 3.5, then they may get there opportunity if I can connect.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001004 - 07/20/10 04:12 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Tomahawk]
|
Bottom Hunter
16 Point
Registered: 12/29/06
Posts: 15480
Loc: Hatchie Bottoms
|
Offline
|
|
Dispersal tells me that very few bucks born in your area will ever live and/or breed there.....
SO..................if one mature buck with great genetics does most of the breeding, HIS gene pool will get dispersed all over the county and even into other counties since some bucks may move many many miles away before settling down.....
SO..............selective harvest does nothing to increase the "big buck" gene pool in your area....thusly unless you can keep the deer in your area, which is very unlikely, it is mainly luck that ANOTHER buck with great genes moves into your area when one of YOUR young bucks moves out.....
did I make any sense there at all?????
_________________________
There are some people who always seem angry and continuously look for conflict.
Walk away; the battle they are fighting is not with you, but with themselves.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001019 - 07/20/10 04:25 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Bottom Hunter]
|
Tomahawk
6 Point
Registered: 07/11/10
Posts: 762
Loc: east & west tn
|
Offline
|
|
Makes sense to me Bottom Hunter. 90% of the bucks that visit my does are "new" to the area as far as not being the ones I photoed the years prior. Every now and then will a particular buck make a return visit, at least from what I can tell from prior photos. I know the bucks don't live there because I keep cameras going all year long over garden sized food plot and only the same does use it until November hits. Thats when the fun begins.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001031 - 07/20/10 04:34 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: turkeyhunter64]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
I guess we are different here in NE TN or on our farm we hunt. Seems to us the same old bucks but just one year older. Now we get some new comers now and then but we seem to keep our bucks around. We also leave the camera's up year round. I know I've got this one buck who is 6 years old, he has a special mark on him...Smart deer too...at least smarter than me....
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001046 - 07/20/10 04:45 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Tomahawk]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
I guess we are different here in NE TN or on our farm we hunt. Seems to us the same old bucks but just one year older. Now we get some new comers now and then but we seem to keep our bucks around. We also leave the camera's up year round. I know I've got this one buck who is 6 years old, he has a special mark on him...Smart deer too...at least smarter than me.... Yea these areas I speak of are very very small. 15-20 acres of urban type hunting. Many small tracts of woods that interconnect. So these bucks could just be around the corner, they just don't seem to invade my nanny does territory until it is time to court her. It really is a terrific situation as far as window of opportunity. Not giants, just solid buck here and there.
Sounds like a good deal to me...I like solid bucks...They got to turn into big bucks someday...
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001059 - 07/20/10 05:00 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BSK]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
IMO, one of the best things we could do for the Tennessee deer herd is simply remove the words "cull buck" from our vocabulary and thinking.
. . . . . removing bucks for no other reason than antler size often has a detrimental affect long-term. All you are doing is removing future mature bucks that would have had a positive influence on the herd, regardless of their antler size. And beyond totally agreeing with BSK, some studies have shown that bucks in a localized deer herd actually grow larger antlers in the presence of a greater number of mature bucks (without regard to the antler size of those mature bucks).
In other words, some type of hormone appears to come into play, stimulating greater antler grow, and this hormone is produced by mature bucks. Fewer mature bucks, then fewer whatever bucks you have getting closer to their genetic potential.
Any time a buck is killed (regardless of his antlers), it reduces the buck:doe ratio and reduces the ongoing buck age structure. Simply better to have more bucks, at least up to somewhere around a 1:1 buck:doe ratio and somewhere around having a good balance in that buck age structure (maybe a third approaching "mature"). Of course, this said under the assumption that there's not too many deer for the habitat, under which conditions more deer period need to removed (but with a greater focus on harvesting female deer).
By "culling" on free-range TN bucks, all you are doing is removing future mature bucks that would have had a positive influence on the herd, regardless of their antler size.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001067 - 07/20/10 05:07 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Bottom Hunter]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
SO..................if one mature buck with great genetics does most of the breeding, HIS gene pool will get dispersed all over the county and even into other counties since some bucks may move many many miles away before settling down.....
did I make any sense there at all????? You're right on about the dispersal, but we've been sold a "bill of goods" regarding the genetics. It's mostly BS.
IMO, most of the deer (buck/does) in one county have just as good a "genetic" make-up as those in most any other county of TN, or in KY, or in Texas. I no longer "buy" that KY bucks have better genetics than TN bucks. There is some rare exception to what I'm saying, but generally speaking, all the talk about genetics is a bunch of BS.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001069 - 07/20/10 05:09 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: turkeyhunter64]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
And what about all these hunting outfitters that allow clients to kill so called "management" bucks. It might appear that that is nothing more than a ploy to get more money. That's my take. Although I have no problem with someone having to pay to hunt, and pay less for taking less. Ain't no free lunch.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001109 - 07/20/10 06:02 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Bottom Hunter]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
Dispersal tells me that very few bucks born in your area will ever live and/or breed there.....
SO..................if one mature buck with great genetics does most of the breeding, HIS gene pool will get dispersed all over the county and even into other counties since some bucks may move many many miles away before settling down.....
SO..............selective harvest does nothing to increase the "big buck" gene pool in your area....thusly unless you can keep the deer in your area, which is very unlikely, it is mainly luck that ANOTHER buck with great genes moves into your area when one of YOUR young bucks moves out.....
did I make any sense there at all?????
You got it Bottom Hunter. The problem with culling is twofold:
First, most bucks disperse from their birth range, taking their genetics with them. The 2 1/2+ year-old bucks you are hunting on a given property were born primarily somewhere else, perhaps miles away. Most are not the sons of local bucks.
Second, a buck's antlers are not the product of a simple genetic "50% from the father, 50% from the mother" process like most assume. How genetics play into expressed antler traits (what a buck actually grows compared to his genetic make-up) is a complicated enough process that no one understands it yet. Once deciphered, it will probably turn out to be a very unusual process, as, so far, it has defied normal genetic explanation.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001113 - 07/20/10 06:08 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BSK]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
When it comes to "management bucks," first let me say that in unique situations, taking out some bucks from the herd actually has some biological benefits, especially in high-fenced situations. A high-fence can only hold so many deer in a healthy manner, hence if you want to make room for the new crop of young bucks, some older bucks have to go. Why not take out the older bucks with the smallest antlers? These are "management bucks," and removing them has a legitimate biological purpose--lowering the buck density.
HOWEVER, in most pay-to-hunt operations, selling "management buck" hunts is simply a way of selling hunts for small-antlered bucks! What brilliant marketing!
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001180 - 07/20/10 07:31 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
mrk80
6 Point
Registered: 05/30/10
Posts: 734
Loc: williamson county TN
|
Offline
|
|
I know most fawns get runned off by the doe when they are of age to fend for themselves and generally vacate to a new area "especially bucks". I also was told that if you shoot a doe that has say twin button bucks when they are old enough to fend for themselves but still traveling with her that those two button bucks will stay local and live their live through maturity in the same area. What is your guys opinion on that?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001203 - 07/20/10 07:46 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
BigGameGuy
TWRA Biologist
12 Point
Registered: 05/14/04
Posts: 6353
Loc: Nashville
|
Offline
|
|
Any time a buck is killed (regardless of his antlers), it reduces the buck:doe ratio and reduces the ongoing buck age structure.
Take a deep breath Wes and repeat after me.
"It okay to kill a buck...It is okay to kill a buck...It is okay to kill a buck"
_________________________
If given the choice between education and regulation, I'll choose education every time.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001221 - 07/20/10 07:53 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BigGameGuy]
|
megalomaniac
10 Point
Registered: 10/28/05
Posts: 4887
Loc: Mississippi
|
Offline
|
|
Any time a buck is killed (regardless of his antlers), it reduces the buck:doe ratio and reduces the ongoing buck age structure. Take a deep breath Wes and repeat after me. "It okay to kill a buck...It is okay to kill a buck...It is okay to kill a buck" 
too funny
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001225 - 07/20/10 07:56 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Football Hunter
18 Point
Registered: 10/22/07
Posts: 24550
Loc: Wilson Co/Perry Co
|
Offline
|
|
Dont shoot small bucks
_________________________
The best day to plant a tree,IS TODAY!
You wont know,if you dont go!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001358 - 07/20/10 09:12 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Quailman
8 Point
Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 1329
Loc: Winchester, TN
|
Offline
|
|
Take a deep breath Wes and repeat after me. "It okay to kill a buck...It is okay to kill a buck...It is okay to kill a buck"  Hey, I agree, it's OK to kill a buck, maybe even TWO (2)!
Good job Wes! Stand your ground!
_________________________
Why work when you can hunt?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001463 - 07/20/10 10:30 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Camp]
|
RKenney
10 Point
Registered: 03/15/08
Posts: 3633
Loc: Maury Co.
|
Offline
|
|
If a 1.5 year old buck, that has super antler growing genes, happens to impregnate a doe, will it be the same result as if the same buck breed that doe when he was 5.5?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001480 - 07/20/10 10:38 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: RKenney]
|
Setterman
8 Point
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1783
Loc: Knoxville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
If a 1.5 year old buck, that has super antler growing genes, happens to impregnate a doe, will it be the same result as if the same buck breed that doe when he was 5.5?
Of course
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001503 - 07/20/10 11:15 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Daff
Spike
Registered: 01/09/08
Posts: 50
Loc: TN
|
Offline
|
|
Culling of inferior 140 class 8pts is common on high fence and huge ranches(texas primarily). The reason for this practice is that The target animals for those trophy hunts is 150 class and up 10+ point bucks. They make big money on those hunts but can't get the same price for the "cull" bucks so they have management hunts to capitalise on the mature bucks that won't bring in $8500 each. the objective is to make money! The flaw with trying to manipulate through culling in a free range herd is the genetics come from both the doe and the buck... so how do you know which does might be carrying undesirable trait?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001589 - 07/21/10 05:56 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Bottom Hunter
16 Point
Registered: 12/29/06
Posts: 15480
Loc: Hatchie Bottoms
|
Offline
|
|
I guess we are different here in NE TN or on our farm we hunt. Seems to us the same old bucks but just one year older. Now we get some new comers now and then but we seem to keep our bucks around. We also leave the camera's up year round. I know I've got this one buck who is 6 years old, he has a special mark on him...Smart deer too...at least smarter than me....
The bucks that you are seeing every year are the ones that came to your area at a very early age.....once a buck puts down roots, he likely will remain there through his entire life.
the dispersal process takes place early in a deer's life......IMO, they never are a part of the breeding pool in their birth place. maybe nature's way of preventing inbreeding...?
the dispersed bucks show up and make your area their home well before they have grown to "respectable" size and before they have aged to dominance status.....
I have changed the way I think about buck harvest over the years.....the main reason that I won't shoot a smaller buck is simply because I don't care to and not for any "biological" reason.
Basically, IMO, if you want a balanced age structure in your area, then some smaller bucks must replace the 2.5 or older bucks on the meat pole.
IMO, I'd rather take the chance that a 1.5 year old buck does not have what it takes to be a 150 inch deer , than to shoot a very nice 120 inch 2.5 year old that maybe can be that deer that gets to 150 plus. If a buck shows promise at 2.5 years of age, then maybe it's best to NOT take him out even though he is the biggest buck you've seen. Maybe letting the 2,5 120 walk and taking a sub-100 inch buck ( to satisfy your bloodlust, lol)is the thing to do. That is if you care about the age structure of your deer and care about what size deer that you kill in the future.
Selective harvest may indeed work if your goal is proper age structure and not simply better genetics....again, having older deer in your herd is simply what proper age structure is about.....it's how nature intended it....so, if you are seeing tons of 1.5 year old bucks in your area and far less older deer, then maybe it would be best to take out a few of those younger deer.
sorry for the rambling.....again, did I make any sense at all?
LOL
_________________________
There are some people who always seem angry and continuously look for conflict.
Walk away; the battle they are fighting is not with you, but with themselves.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001654 - 07/21/10 07:09 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: turkeyhunter64]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
BSK schooled me on this subject a ways back and he was right. Here is my take on it...There no reason to cull in open range hunting. If you see a buck and want the buck then shoot the buck..its your tag.I'm selective on does as well..example if there are young one's with a doe then I pass. If it is a young buck then I pass.So yes I am selective in my harvest. And the bottom line is the hunting regs. force you to be selective if you think about it.
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001676 - 07/21/10 07:33 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
There no reason to cull in open range hunting. If you see a buck and want the buck then shoot the buck . . its your tag. I'm selective . . . . . Do you think hunters are generally LESS selective (on bucks, i.e., more likely to shoot ANY particular buck) when they have multiple buck tags, say two (2) vs. one (1)?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001754 - 07/21/10 08:36 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: RKenney]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
If a 1.5 year old buck, that has super antler growing genes, happens to impregnate a doe, will it be the same result as if the same buck breed that doe when he was 5.5?
An animal's genetics don't change (other than the odd mutation) over their lifespan.
However, the really important question is, if a 1 1/2 year-old buck with super antler growing genes happens to impregnate a doe, has he passed any of those antler genes on to his offspring? To date, the best research suggests the answer is, "No."
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001813 - 07/21/10 09:07 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
There no reason to cull in open range hunting. If you see a buck and want the buck then shoot the buck . . its your tag. I'm selective . . . . . Do you think hunters are generally LESS selective (on bucks, i.e., more likely to shoot ANY particular buck) when they have multiple buck tags, say two (2) vs. one (1)?
I can't speak for other hunters but in my case if I only had one tag I still would be selective and if I had 3 tags I'm still selective. I only take what I feel is the right buck to take. Now with the change in the upcoming reg for my area I can take 7 doe's and 3 Bucks. I said this the other day I might not take any bucks this season..only if a nice one shows. I have doe's for the freezer now...
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001831 - 07/21/10 09:14 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
Now with the change in the upcoming reg for my area I can take 7 doe's and 3 Bucks . . . . . . I might not take any bucks this season . . . . . I have doe's for the freezer now . . . I've been saying for years that one of the best ways to see more bucks get a year older is to allow the harvest of "a" deer, instead of just ANY buck.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001837 - 07/21/10 09:16 AM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
Now with the change in the upcoming reg for my area I can take 7 doe's and 3 Bucks . . . . . . I might not take any bucks this season . . . . . I have doe's for the freezer now . . . I've been saying for years that one of the best ways to see more bucks get a year older is to allow the harvest of "a" deer, instead of just ANY buck.
Agree...
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002196 - 07/21/10 01:30 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
BigSatt
10 Point
Registered: 05/15/09
Posts: 3499
Loc: Northern Middle Tn.
|
Offline
|
|
Now with the change in the upcoming reg for my area I can take 7 doe's and 3 Bucks . . . . . . I might not take any bucks this season . . . . . I have doe's for the freezer now . . . I've been saying for years that one of the best ways to see more bucks get a year older is to allow the harvest of "a" deer, instead of just ANY buck. Agree...
x2
_________________________
Nothing Great is ever achieved without enthusiasm.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002203 - 07/21/10 01:37 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BigSatt]
|
Winchester
Non-Typical
Registered: 12/05/03
Posts: 25229
Loc: TN
|
Offline
|
|
I've been saying for years that one of the best ways to see more bucks get a year older is to allow the harvest of "a" deer, instead of just ANY buck. I couldnt agree more. I think if it was either sex in all areas that can stand it, we would see many more young bucks get a 2'nd year under their belt. As it is now many people are simply forced to shoot a young buck because its the only legal deer they see. I think this could be the single most effective change that could be made to get more bucks to another year of age, and it would do nothing but make more hunters happy IMO.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002210 - 07/21/10 01:39 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Winchester]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
I would have no problem with that in areas that can withstand the extra doe harvest.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002388 - 07/21/10 03:37 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BSK]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
BSK,
That's what I'm saying cause in my area I got 3 more doe tags..... Thank you TWRA........
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002409 - 07/21/10 03:51 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
Wes,
I think you missed my point I agree with you but now I can be selective and take a doe instead of a buck.
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002485 - 07/21/10 04:46 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
Wes, I think you missed my point I agree with you but now I can be selective and take a doe instead of a buck. Good chance I missed your point.  In your county, say a guy just wants to go deer hunting, say on opening weekend or Thanksgiving, goes out, buys his deer hunting license, wants to spend as little as possible just to go deer hunting with his family and/or friends. What is this fellow allowed to "harvest" in your county?
Nov 21 Opening Gun Season: Antlerless hunt Nov 22-28 2 does and Dec 18 - 26 2 more does. He still has 3 buck tags. Does this answer your question?
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002488 - 07/21/10 04:49 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
Partially.  How many doe tags does that fellow have?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002491 - 07/21/10 04:52 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
I asked the TWRA that same question on how many doe's can I take this season and infoman said 7 doe's for Johnson Co. with a Sportman lic. A total of 7 doe's for the season...
Based on the info I got that fellow will only have the 4 tags...
Where are you going with this, if I may ask?
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002497 - 07/21/10 04:57 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
My point was the fellow has zero (0) doe tags. And it doesn't matter to him how many YOU have.  He has none. And he may be the "average" deer hunter in your county.
By comparison, if this same "average" one or two-weekend a year deer hunter were doing it in Kentucky, he would be issued a basic deer hunting license which would generally entitle him to take 1 antlerless deer and 1 antlered deer. We should call the basic TN deer hunting license a buck hunting license.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002498 - 07/21/10 04:57 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
I asked the TWRA that same question on how many doe's can I take this season and infoman said 7 doe's for Johnson Co. with a Sportman lic. A total of 7 doe's for the season...
Based on the info I got that fellow will only have the 4 tags...
Where are you going with this, if I may ask?
If he just bought the basic gun license, he wouldn't be able to shoot any does.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002506 - 07/21/10 05:08 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: BSK]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
BSK, your right forgive me Wes for being misleading.... Sportman Lic or Type 94 permit.
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002511 - 07/21/10 05:10 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
Wes, I understand what your saying and yes I would be glad to give up a buck tag for another doe tag... with a basic hunting lic.
Now you know why I buy a Sportsman Lic....
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002514 - 07/21/10 05:13 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Double-D-Team]
|
Wes Parrish
16 Point
Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16952
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
|
Offline
|
|
Now you know why I buy a Sportsman Lic.... Same here. But the more "average" hunters are less willing to spend more money for it. Thus, many kill the first legal deer they see, which is a buck. You and I are "deer" hunting; they are "buck" hunting, and for them, "any" buck will do.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002523 - 07/21/10 05:16 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
Double-D-Team
10 Point
Registered: 12/18/02
Posts: 3483
Loc: God's Country
|
Offline
|
|
I understand and yes I feel the same way. Why not a doe tag for the late or gun hunter only? 2 bucks and 1 doe... Another way for them to get extra revenue don't you think....You get what you pay for...
_________________________
Don and Dee (DOUBLE-D-TEAM) THE RICHEST VALUES OF WILDERNESS LIE NOT IN THE DAYS OF DANIEL BOONE NOR EVEN IN THE PRESENT. BUT IN THE FUTURE--LEOPOLD
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2006879 - 07/25/10 08:51 PM
Re: Open for debate..selective harvest..
[Re: Wes Parrish]
|
BigSatt
10 Point
Registered: 05/15/09
Posts: 3499
Loc: Northern Middle Tn.
|
Offline
|
|
My point was the fellow has zero (0) doe tags. And it doesn't matter to him how many YOU have.  He has none. And he may be the "average" deer hunter in your county. By comparison, if this same "average" one or two-weekend a year deer hunter were doing it in Kentucky, he would be issued a basic deer hunting license which would generally entitle him to take 1 antlerless deer and 1 antlered deer. We should call the basic TN deer hunting license a buck hunting license. 
Actually, in Ky., it is one antlerless only tag and one either sex tag across the counter.
_________________________
Nothing Great is ever achieved without enthusiasm.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: RUGER, Tennessee Todd, Unicam, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, Bobby G, Outdoor Lady, TurkeyBurd
|
12102 Members
38 Forums
115543 Topics
1407774 Posts
Max Online: 756 @ 11/20/12 09:10 AM
|
|
|
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!
|
|
|