Tndeer Logo

Page 2 of 21 <12345>Last »
Topic Options
#1983103 - 07/05/10 08:58 PM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: 1 good shot]
Camp
12 Point


Registered: 11/30/07
Posts: 5917
Loc: Rutherford County / Mid TN

Offline
And don't get me wrong. 3 is WAY better than the 11 it used to be. Personally I'd prefer the 2-3 or maybe just 2 along with some does for meat. But as it is, is STILL so much better than it was for all those years when I started back in the early 80's.

We've even got some big bucks now, back in that cove those guys used to kill everything out of!

I won't knock anybody for taking their 3 bucks. (Like I did for that bunch slaying 11 each and no even eating them.) ;\)

Top
#1983270 - 07/05/10 11:15 PM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: Camp]
RKenney
10 Point


Registered: 03/15/08
Posts: 3633
Loc: Maury Co.

Offline
All I know is, in the last six to eight years, there seems to be
many more older bucks being killed. Personally, I don't think
"limits" play that big a role in what I'm seeing.

I think hunter education in deer management and certain trends
have the most impact.

Top
#1983281 - 07/05/10 11:48 PM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: muddyboots]
TN RDG RNR
12 Point


Registered: 06/28/07
Posts: 6094
Loc: Rhea County

Offline
 Originally Posted By: muddyboots
I must know most all of the people who kill three bucks a year.


I know quite a few hunters. None of which have ever killed out if my memory serves me right.

Does TWRA have a record of how many hunters killed 3 bucks each year? Id be interested in seeing that number. Just to see how many bucks would be saved by a 2 buck limit.
_________________________
WARNING: The above post may contain sarcasm and/or sophisticated satire. I will not be held liable for any psychological damage sustained.

Top
#1983299 - 07/06/10 05:54 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: RKenney]
ghosthunter
10 Point


Registered: 11/30/04
Posts: 3446
Loc: chattanooga

Offline
 Originally Posted By: RKenney
All I know is, in the last six to eight years, there seems to be
many more older bucks being killed. Personally, I don't think
"limits" play that big a role in what I'm seeing.

I think hunter education in deer management and certain trends
have the most impact.
So, if limits don't play much of a role, would the herd be where it's at today if we still had the 11 buck limit?
_________________________
it's a long way to the top if ya wanna rock 'n' roll

Top
#1983323 - 07/06/10 06:34 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: RKenney]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16978
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: RKenney
Personally, I don't think
"limits" play that big a role in what I'm seeing.

I think hunter education in deer management and certain trends
have the most impact.

I believe "limits" have played a big role in helping to formulate those trends, as well as motivating (or causing) many hunters to better educate themselves on deer management.

And it's not just buck limits, but doe limits as well.
Since 1998 we have had huge increases in "antlerless" limits,
which has "shifted" much of the harvest pressure off bucks.

When I started deer hunting in TN, TWRA was holding public meetings educating hunters as to why female deer should be highly protected and it wouldn't matter much how many bucks were killed ---- creating a mindset among most hunters and the public that female deer were much like a "sacred cow". It has taken many years to off-set this "sacred cow" mindset, and there's still a ways to go, both among hunters and game agencies.

Top
#1983326 - 07/06/10 06:46 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: Wes Parrish]
Wes Parrish
16 Point


Registered: 06/12/02
Posts: 16978
Loc: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: TN RDG RNR
Does TWRA have a record of how many hunters killed 3 bucks each year?
Id be interested in seeing that number. Just to see how many bucks would be saved by a 2 buck limit.

However, THAT number would be no where close to the answer to your question, i.e. how many bucks would be saved by a 2-buck limit.

You see, there is a huge segment of the more accomplished hunters (the ones that almost always kill deer annually) who will "hold back by one" regarding buck limits. So long as these hunters have days ahead to hunt, they will avoid killing that last buck which would cause them to limit out.

When there is only one (1) buck tag remaining, many hunters are significantly more selective.

To answer your question regarding "how many" bucks would be saved if going from a 3 to a 2-buck limit, a better answer might be in looking at the difference between how many hunters kill 1 buck vs. how many kill 2 bucks.

Not to mention, with lower buck limits, hunters also become more selective on their very 1st buck, not just the last buck. What I'm saying is due to this increased selectivity, there would also being many more hunters killing zero (0) bucks intead of just 1 buck. Yet, none of these hunters who don't kill a buck would have been denied that opportunity --- they just would be choosing to save their buck tag(s) for something more meaningful to them.

At the same time, the most inexperienced hunters, those who would not pass on any bucks, would be provided greater opportunity to kill "a" buck, since there would simply be more "passed" bucks roaming the woods.

Top
#1983346 - 07/06/10 07:32 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: Camp]
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical


Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Camp
 Originally Posted By: BSK
The harvest data suggests few hunters are actually killing 3 bucks.
What the limit is and what hunters are killing may very well be two different things.

Averages sometimes don't mean squat in reality when you consider the little picture instead of the big one based on stat averages.


No one is talking about average. We're talking about the exact number of hunters that reported killing three bucks. It was not many.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan

"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James

Top
#1983347 - 07/06/10 07:33 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: ghosthunter]
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical


Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: ghosthunter
So, would it be fair to say that if the 11 buck limit was never reduced that the herd would pretty much be right where it's at today?


Some difference, but not a huge difference. The buck age structure was already improving before the limit change and has continued to improve at the same rate since the change.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan

"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James

Top
#1983366 - 07/06/10 07:49 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: BSK]
Winchester
Non-Typical


Registered: 12/05/03
Posts: 25245
Loc: TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: BSK
 Originally Posted By: ghosthunter
So, would it be fair to say that if the 11 buck limit was never reduced that the herd would pretty much be right where it's at today?


Some difference, but not a huge difference. The buck age structure was already improving before the limit change and has continued to improve at the same rate since the change.

Exactly right, it no doubt helped some, mainly with hunter mentality, but it didnt take us into a whole different deer/buck herd in a year or two by any stretch of the imagination. Things continued to improve slowly, just like they were already doing, and are still doing today. Im one that thinks issuing a simple either sex tag with a standard gun stamp, where the herd can stand it, which is much of the state now, would benefit much more than lowering the buck limit.

Top
#1983411 - 07/06/10 08:37 AM Re: Why a limit change? [Re: BSK]
Football Hunter
18 Point


Registered: 10/22/07
Posts: 24550
Loc: Wilson Co/Perry Co

Offline
 Originally Posted By: BSK
 Originally Posted By: ghosthunter
So, would it be fair to say that if the 11 buck limit was never reduced that the herd would pretty much be right where it's at today?


Some difference, but not a huge difference. The buck age structure was already improving before the limit change and has continued to improve at the same rate since the change.
But isnt "some" a big number when you start talking statewide?
_________________________
The best day to plant a tree,IS TODAY!

You wont know,if you dont go!


Top
Page 2 of 21 <12345>Last »


Moderator:  RUGER, Tennessee Todd, Unicam, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, Bobby G, Outdoor Lady, TurkeyBurd 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4097469
RUGER
80525
Deer Assassin
59548
BSK
55999
Crappie Luck
50718
spitndrum
Newest Members
ConK11, loufaulkner, melvin, woundedgun, nonfant
12107 Registered Users
Who's Online
83 registered (in the dog house!, Cottontop, ruger7mag, Devin2009, Andy S., WVBulldog, 11 invisible) and 129 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
12107 Members
38 Forums
115802 Topics
1410573 Posts

Max Online: 756 @ 11/20/12 09:10 AM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.029 seconds in which 0.013 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.