#1827758 - 03/08/10 08:15 AM
Something kind of interesting............
|
gator-n-buck
16 Point
Registered: 10/22/08
Posts: 14956
Loc: Knox, TN / Palatka, FL
|
Offline
|
|
I have checked out the top 10 BC states to see what they might have in common on the surface. A couple of interesting things I found. They all border each other, except for Texas. They all are North of Tennessee, except for Texas. I can see why maybe TN is not in the mix but Indiana seems to be surrounded... The top four states are bunched right together, I found that very interesting... Makes me wonder how big of factor, genetics and soil comes into play.....
1. IOWA 615
2. MINNESOTA 608
3. WISCONSIN 589
4. ILLINOIS 552
5. TEXAS 316
6. MISSOURI 285
7. KENTUCKY 279
8. KANSAS 255
9. OHIO 235
10. MICHIGAN 155
The states in gray are the top 10 BC states.
[img] [/img]
Edited by gator-n-buck (03/08/10 08:16 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827763 - 03/08/10 08:25 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
Setterman
8 Point
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1783
Loc: Knoxville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
I find it strange that folks think that TN is a legitimate contender to be in the top 10 B&C states. That is not possible IMO. It is probably possible to crack the top 20, but not the top 10.
If you closed deer season for 10 years, then came in with tranq. guns, just to see if you could break into the top 10 I bet it wouldn't be possible.
As far as that map, I don't doubt it at all. And I don't really care, for me quality bucks are all that I am after and we have plenty here, sure our neighbors may have more, but we have enough to make it interesting.
Edited by Setterman (03/08/10 08:25 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827769 - 03/08/10 08:31 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Setterman]
|
bigdog7mm
4 Point
Registered: 03/05/09
Posts: 113
Loc: TN
|
Offline
|
|
That map pretty much shows what the three buck limit will do, just look at IN right in the middle with their 3 buck limit up until just a few years ago.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827783 - 03/08/10 08:44 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: bigdog7mm]
|
gator-n-buck
16 Point
Registered: 10/22/08
Posts: 14956
Loc: Knox, TN / Palatka, FL
|
Offline
|
|
That map pretty much shows what the three buck limit will do, just look at IN right in the middle with their 3 buck limit up until just a few years ago.
I'm not sure thats true... There are states that are not in the top 10 that have one buck limits. There are 4 or 5 states in the top 10 that have more than a one buck limit.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827804 - 03/08/10 09:06 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
Setterman
8 Point
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1783
Loc: Knoxville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
You can spin it anyway you would like, depends on what goals a person is centered on.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827811 - 03/08/10 09:14 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Setterman]
|
mathews338
10 Point
Registered: 11/05/09
Posts: 4040
Loc: jackson co.
|
Offline
|
|
I find it strange that folks think that TN is a legitimate contender to be in the top 10 B&C states. That is not possible IMO. It is probably possible to crack the top 20, but not the top 10.
If you closed deer season for 10 years, then came in with tranq. guns, just to see if you could break into the top 10 I bet it wouldn't be possible.
As far as that map, I don't doubt it at all. And I don't really care, for me quality bucks are all that I am after and we have plenty here, sure our neighbors may have more, but we have enough to make it interesting. i agree quality is all i'm after sure b&c would be nice but i would rather have several p&y on the wall than one b&c
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827897 - 03/08/10 10:12 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: mathews338]
|
gator-n-buck
16 Point
Registered: 10/22/08
Posts: 14956
Loc: Knox, TN / Palatka, FL
|
Offline
|
|
[img] [/img]
Edited by gator-n-buck (03/08/10 10:12 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827909 - 03/08/10 10:25 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
Deer Bio
Spike
Registered: 02/26/10
Posts: 52
Loc: United states
|
Offline
|
|
A couple things. Remember, this is the alltime BC list. If you did a list from just the last 20 years, the last 10 years, the last 5 years, it would be different. Ind, who has never been in the top 10, would probably be in the top 5 in the last 5 years, since going to a 1 buck limit. And there are states like Ill that have a 2 buck limit, but they dont have any gun season during the rut. There are lots of ways to protect your buck herd besides just the 1 buck limit.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827922 - 03/08/10 10:44 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Deer Bio]
|
Setterman
8 Point
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1783
Loc: Knoxville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
A couple things. Remember, this is the alltime BC list. If you did a list from just the last 20 years, the last 10 years, the last 5 years, it would be different. Ind, who has never been in the top 10, would probably be in the top 5 in the last 5 years, since going to a 1 buck limit. And there are states like Ill that have a 2 buck limit, but they dont have any gun season during the rut. There are lots of ways to protect your buck herd besides just the 1 buck limit.
Very interesting again. If IN went to a 1 buck limit, and then moved into the top 5, then there really is no disputing the impacts that reg change can have on the buck age structure. I guess it all comes down to what the desires of the managing agencies goals are and how those correlate with the license holders of that state.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1827940 - 03/08/10 10:51 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Setterman]
|
gator-n-buck
16 Point
Registered: 10/22/08
Posts: 14956
Loc: Knox, TN / Palatka, FL
|
Offline
|
|
A couple things. Remember, this is the alltime BC list. If you did a list from just the last 20 years, the last 10 years, the last 5 years, it would be different. Ind, who has never been in the top 10, would probably be in the top 5 in the last 5 years, since going to a 1 buck limit. And there are states like Ill that have a 2 buck limit, but they dont have any gun season during the rut. There are lots of ways to protect your buck herd besides just the 1 buck limit. Very interesting again. If IN went to a 1 buck limit, and then moved into the top 5, then there really is no disputing the impacts that reg change can have on the buck age structure. I guess it all comes down to what the desires of the managing agencies goals are and how those correlate with the license holders of that state.
It appears that IN might already have a few other factors in place by looking at its surrounding states (soil and genetics). You can make a Yugo a little faster but it will never out run a Ferrari......JMO
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828003 - 03/08/10 11:24 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
Setterman
8 Point
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1783
Loc: Knoxville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
I agree, but that is in terms of maximum antler size and not in terms of age structure. I think what Deer bio is eluding to is that more bucks will reach an age where they can achieve max. potential with 1 buck limits.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828039 - 03/08/10 11:55 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
Deer Bio
Spike
Registered: 02/26/10
Posts: 52
Loc: United states
|
Offline
|
|
A couple things. Remember, this is the alltime BC list. If you did a list from just the last 20 years, the last 10 years, the last 5 years, it would be different. Ind, who has never been in the top 10, would probably be in the top 5 in the last 5 years, since going to a 1 buck limit. And there are states like Ill that have a 2 buck limit, but they dont have any gun season during the rut. There are lots of ways to protect your buck herd besides just the 1 buck limit. Very interesting again. If IN went to a 1 buck limit, and then moved into the top 5, then there really is no disputing the impacts that reg change can have on the buck age structure. I guess it all comes down to what the desires of the managing agencies goals are and how those correlate with the license holders of that state. It appears that IN might already have a few other factors in place by looking at its surrounding states (soil and genetics). You can make a Yugo a little faster but it will never out run a Ferrari......JMO
I think that proves my contention all along. Ind has everything it takes to make big deer, just like Ill, Iowa, etc. But they havent. I believe its BSK on here who says a monkey could manage a midwestern state. But for some reason that monkey running Ind has never produced the deer its neighbors do. Ind wasnt even in the top 10. UNTIL going to a 1 buck limit 8 years ago. They have gone from not being in the top 10, to probably top 5 in the last few years. Like setterman said, my contention is that the 1 buck limit increased the age structure. You can look up Ind data, they have no doubt increased their age structure since going to a 1 buck limit. A better age structure, means larger deer. I am not sure how anyone can argue with Indianas results. Those that truely have an open mind, should really take a look at Indianas results, its very telling in my opinion.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828041 - 03/08/10 11:56 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
mathews338
10 Point
Registered: 11/05/09
Posts: 4040
Loc: jackson co.
|
Offline
|
|
A couple things. Remember, this is the alltime BC list. If you did a list from just the last 20 years, the last 10 years, the last 5 years, it would be different. Ind, who has never been in the top 10, would probably be in the top 5 in the last 5 years, since going to a 1 buck limit. And there are states like Ill that have a 2 buck limit, but they dont have any gun season during the rut. There are lots of ways to protect your buck herd besides just the 1 buck limit. Very interesting again. If IN went to a 1 buck limit, and then moved into the top 5, then there really is no disputing the impacts that reg change can have on the buck age structure. I guess it all comes down to what the desires of the managing agencies goals are and how those correlate with the license holders of that state. It appears that IN might already have a few other factors in place by looking at its surrounding states (soil and genetics). You can make a Yugo a little faster but it will never out run a Ferrari......JMO JMO but it seems like some want to only look at the facts they choose to
yes soil and genetics play a role but age and limits and mindset of the hunters which is a directly related to limits and how long they get to hunt with each weapon and firearms during rut
how big of a difference would it make here if you only had a few days of rifle that did not take place during rut or had a one or two buck limit not saying i want them but you have to be rational and realize that there is way more to it than what most argue about on here
the truth is that we can not compare TN to any other state because we are not like any other state and may not ever be in terms of limits and seasons so until we are it is all just opinions and you will never be able to present all the facts, how would you even begin to figure how the mindset of hunters change when the limits change, you can't unless you try it first
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828055 - 03/08/10 12:13 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: mathews338]
|
BigWes50
10 Point
Registered: 03/04/07
Posts: 3207
Loc: Chattanooga, TN
|
Offline
|
|
A couple things. Remember, this is the alltime BC list. If you did a list from just the last 20 years, the last 10 years, the last 5 years, it would be different. Ind, who has never been in the top 10, would probably be in the top 5 in the last 5 years, since going to a 1 buck limit. And there are states like Ill that have a 2 buck limit, but they dont have any gun season during the rut. There are lots of ways to protect your buck herd besides just the 1 buck limit. Very interesting again. If IN went to a 1 buck limit, and then moved into the top 5, then there really is no disputing the impacts that reg change can have on the buck age structure. I guess it all comes down to what the desires of the managing agencies goals are and how those correlate with the license holders of that state. It appears that IN might already have a few other factors in place by looking at its surrounding states (soil and genetics). You can make a Yugo a little faster but it will never out run a Ferrari......JMO JMO but it seems like some want to only look at the facts they choose to yes soil and genetics play a role but age and limits and mindset of the hunters which is a directly related to limits and how long they get to hunt with each weapon and firearms during rut how big of a difference would it make here if you only had a few days of rifle that did not take place during rut or had a one or two buck limit not saying i want them but you have to be rational and realize that there is way more to it than what most argue about on here the truth is that we can not compare TN to any other state because we are not like any other state and may not ever be in terms of limits and seasons so until we are it is all just opinions and you will never be able to present all the facts, how would you even begin to figure how the mindset of hunters change when the limits change, you can't unless you try it first
Spot on!
_________________________
Just as the deer can suddenly materialize in the woods, "Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect" (Matthew 24:44)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828415 - 03/08/10 05:06 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
gator-n-buck
16 Point
Registered: 10/22/08
Posts: 14956
Loc: Knox, TN / Palatka, FL
|
Offline
|
|
[img]  [/img]
I would like to have a map of the ccunties that the BC entries were killed in. I think it would be interesting to see considering the top 5, out of 6 states (except TX) makes one big triangle. It seems like several states that border these top 5 have several entries. It would be neat to see if the counties in KY that border IL and OH have higher entries. I know you can kill a freak in any county but I'm talking about where do the majority of the BC bucks come from. I think soil and genetics play a bigger factor than buck limits. Just because theres a states line doesn't mean that some of those states don't share the same soil. It looks like the S.E. is a whole different ball game and TN just falls below that line.....JMO.
P.S. I'm not buying into that buck limits from three to one will make that big of a difference in TN. Several of those top ten states have a two buck limit and had entries in the record bucks way before these states went to stricter regs,.....JMO
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828443 - 03/08/10 05:40 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
mathews338
10 Point
Registered: 11/05/09
Posts: 4040
Loc: jackson co.
|
Offline
|
|
gator-n-buck soil is a factor but like you said the soil does not just stop at the state line so looks like alot of KY soil would dip into alot of TN making TN soil not that much different and if you look at the more detailed maps from other posts then you would see that all of EKY is alot worse than any of TN i think that if you avg. the two states soil then there is not much difference and those other states all have regs. that aid the deer to reach maturity
short firearms shotgun ML only bow only during peak rut 1 or 2 buck limits
and the biggest of all could be that the majority of the hunters in those states have the mindset to let them go til they reach maturity what i'm saying is that if you are surrounded by guys who let them walk the more likely you will peer pressure so to speak JMO that soil is only part of the battle
not saying that TN would start producing the amount of b&c as other states but P&Y entries would climb IMO
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828801 - 03/08/10 08:26 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Deer Bio]
|
Bigg'un4214
8 Point
Registered: 05/10/04
Posts: 2403
Loc: east tn
|
Offline
|
|
A better age structure, means larger deer. [/quote]
If this is the case then TN should be comparable to KY in antler size. Based on what I have saw on here the age structures of harvested deer are comparable.
_________________________
Tennessee roots over 200 years deep and growing.....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828871 - 03/08/10 09:11 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: mathews338]
|
Yodel Dog
8 Point
Registered: 10/14/08
Posts: 1087
Loc: Mid Tn
|
Offline
|
|
...how would you even begin to figure how the mindset of hunters change when the limits change, you can't unless you try it first
I'm in!
_________________________
"...Shooting a deer is like shooting a cow..." Phil Robertson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828884 - 03/08/10 09:18 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: gator-n-buck]
|
Deer Bio
Spike
Registered: 02/26/10
Posts: 52
Loc: United states
|
Offline
|
|
[img]  [/img] I think soil and genetics play a bigger factor than buck limits. Just because theres a states line doesn't mean that some of those states don't share the same soil. It looks like the S.E. is a whole different ball game and TN just falls below that line.....JMO. P.S. I'm not buying into that buck limits from three to one will make that big of a difference in TN. Several of those top ten states have a two buck limit and had entries in the record bucks way before these states went to stricter regs,.....JMO
I heard a biologist from Wisc speak onetime some years ago. He made the statement, if you dont think buck limits make a difference, then look at a BC map, and pay special attention to the Wisc-Michigan state line. He went on to say, that Wisc was the #1 BC producer of all-time, but that one quick look of a BC map showed a distinct difference between the Wisc-Mich state line, and it wasnt a coincidence. Its not the only state line that sure provides a stark difference. I am not sure how people can explain that away. Also, yes there are some states like Ill with a two buck limit on the BC list. But they have a short shotgun season after the rut. Lots of ways to protect you age structure.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828903 - 03/08/10 09:25 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Deer Bio]
|
gator-n-buck
16 Point
Registered: 10/22/08
Posts: 14956
Loc: Knox, TN / Palatka, FL
|
Offline
|
|
[img]  [/img] I think soil and genetics play a bigger factor than buck limits. Just because theres a states line doesn't mean that some of those states don't share the same soil. It looks like the S.E. is a whole different ball game and TN just falls below that line.....JMO. P.S. I'm not buying into that buck limits from three to one will make that big of a difference in TN. Several of those top ten states have a two buck limit and had entries in the record bucks way before these states went to stricter regs,.....JMO I heard a biologist from Wisc speak onetime some years ago. He made the statement, if you dont think buck limits make a difference, then look at a BC map, and pay special attention to the Wisc-Michigan state line. He went on to say, that Wisc was the #1 BC producer of all-time, but that one quick look of a BC map showed a distinct difference between the Wisc-Mich state line, and it wasnt a coincidence. Its not the only state line that sure provides a stark difference. I am not sure how people can explain that away. Also, yes there are some states like Ill with a two buck limit on the BC list. But they have a short shotgun season after the rut. Lots of ways to protect you age structure.
I realize the buck limit guys want to push the issue, that if we change the limits, we will be like KY. The only problem with that is I found the first soil map that I came to and added the map that I colored in for the top BC states. Neither one was posted to be put together but they match pretty good. The BC states run right with the soil states on these maps that I put together.... Interesting, TN and E. KY pretty much stink on the soil map except for the KY counties that border the Ohio river...
P.S. I have found that a lot of the monster bucks that are killed in KY are along the Ohio river or S. IL.....
Edited by gator-n-buck (03/08/10 09:30 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1828917 - 03/08/10 09:30 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Deer Bio]
|
Quailman
8 Point
Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 1329
Loc: Winchester, TN
|
Offline
|
|
Also, yes there are some states like Ill with a two buck limit on the BC list. But they have a short shotgun season after the rut.
Actually, the 1st Illinois shotgun hunt (3-day) normally starts around November 18, which is usually around the peak of the rut or just slightly after (at least where I hunt in S. Illinois). But their short gun season does help.
_________________________
Why work when you can hunt?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1829018 - 03/08/10 10:14 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Quailman]
|
Deer Bio
Spike
Registered: 02/26/10
Posts: 52
Loc: United states
|
Offline
|
|
Also, yes there are some states like Ill with a two buck limit on the BC list. But they have a short shotgun season after the rut. Actually, the 1st Illinois shotgun hunt (3-day) normally starts around November 18, which is usually around the peak of the rut or just slightly after (at least where I hunt in S. Illinois). But their short gun season does help.
Dont quote me on this, but I thought I had seen fecal studys from Ill that backdated the peak to the 12th of Nov. Which would mean their gun season started 6 days after the peak.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1829041 - 03/08/10 10:27 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Deer Bio]
|
Yodel Dog
8 Point
Registered: 10/14/08
Posts: 1087
Loc: Mid Tn
|
Offline
|
|
Dont quote me on this, but I thought I had seen fecal studys from Ill that backdated the peak to the 12th of Nov. Which would mean their gun season started 6 days after the peak.
How can that be determined from feces?
_________________________
"...Shooting a deer is like shooting a cow..." Phil Robertson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1829069 - 03/08/10 11:08 PM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Yodel Dog]
|
Deer Bio
Spike
Registered: 02/26/10
Posts: 52
Loc: United states
|
Offline
|
|
Dont quote me on this, but I thought I had seen fecal studys from Ill that backdated the peak to the 12th of Nov. Which would mean their gun season started 6 days after the peak. How can that be determined from feces?
Lol. I meant to type fetus, and typed fecal. My mind was on other things.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1829111 - 03/09/10 01:31 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Deer Bio]
|
Travis E
6 Point
Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 782
Loc: TN / From Boone Co. WV
|
Offline
|
|
I believe both play a part and I think most of you agree. But I for one know from experience that the short or no rifle season has a lot to do with producing big bucks. I grew up in Boone County WV and could drive 10 minutes south to Logan County and have a better chance of killing a large buck because Logan has been archery only for the past twenty some years. Boone on the other hand had a rifle season which sounded like a war. Boone did produce some decent bucks but everyone knew if you was really wantin to kill a big one you would go hunt down in Logan. I knew guys who hunted both and the biggest bucks I have seen killed in WV came from Logan Co. without a doubt. I personally enjoy both rifle and bow and wouldn't want archery only. I'm not that concerned about getting a big 190 inch buck. I've never been into scoring and I don't much about it. I just like hunting and having a good healthy deer population. WV's was perfectly fine with me and it wasn’t a "trophy state." If TN is equal to WV in the health of the deer heard and quality of deer I will be very content when I make the move there.
forgot to add that if I was bent on makin the state I hunted in a "trophy state" I would advocate for a shorter rifle season and a buck limit of 2 or 3 sounds good to me considering I have never killed over 2 in a season 
Heres an article I found:
http://www.outdoorlife.com/node/45328
WEST VIRGINIA
For more than 20 years, a block of four counties along West Virginia's southwestern border--Logan, McDowell, Mingo and Wyoming--have been limited to archery-only for whitetail hunting. These counties now yield excellent trophy whitetail hunting. For example, during the 2002 season, of the 65 trophy bucks (scores of at least 126 typical or 155 non-typical B&C) taken in the state's 55 counties, 37 came from the four archery-only counties.
Several large public-hunting areas lie within the four counties, including the 17,000-acre RD Bailey WMA, the 7,810-acre Panther State Forest, the 18,000-acre Tug Fork WMA and the 13,000-acre Laurel Lake WMA. ATVs aren't allowed in these WMAs. These counties also have large timber and mining company land holdings that are open to public hunting.
Edited by Travis E (03/09/10 02:15 AM)
_________________________
Animals are tasty.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1829253 - 03/09/10 07:38 AM
Re: Something kind of interesting............
[Re: Travis E]
|
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical
Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59668
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
Offline
|
|
A B&C map like that displays more about growth potential than anything else, with the exception of TX. TX truly is about buck age structure, but TX is a universe of their own considering land-ownership patterns. With the ability to control harvest on tens of thousands of acres, land-owners can produce astonishing buck age structures.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan
"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: RUGER, Tennessee Todd, Unicam, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, Bobby G, Outdoor Lady, TurkeyBurd
|
12168 Members
39 Forums
117656 Topics
1428543 Posts
Max Online: 756 @ 11/20/12 09:10 AM
|
|
|
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!
|
|
|