Is the number of B&C bucks the only way to measure the hunting? I sure hope not, or hunters have truly "lost the way."

Thats good then. I would think, there are alot of hunters knowing that (IF) they wasnt returning to the Fort that particular year, it was there last afternoon, and the hours were getting short... I think the "goal" may be lowered a little. Younger deer would be targeted. It would almost be like passing up a "freebee" deer if they didnt harvest it.

I know for certain it has happened inside other areas within the state that holds some great potential.

u would be very very surprised how many people pass small deer there..im glad some of the smaller ones get killed it frees up areas for me for nov..

I am pretty sure if there is a way to check it that military killed most of the deer last year.Most soldiers have no where else to hunt.Most soldiers in the 101st know they are deployed about every other year so they take what ever buck comes along,as it should be.Most may only be stationed there for only a couple years.They have no reason not to shoot the 1.5 year old bucks.

Fort Campbell is just fine,leave it as it is!

What is the hunter success rate in KY?

Over 20 years ago, I advocated selecting certain WMA's as trophy areas. I wrote an article or two about it. I almost got hung.

You're almost always in danger of being hung throughout your career

You're almost always in danger of being hung throughout your career

100% for me. it is not IF i kill one, it is how big/old will the one i kill be?

Most hunters in the state are more than satisfied with the limits we have now. If a hunters success can only be measured by the score of the antlers of the buck he takes we are in sorry shape. Most hunters couldn't care less about where the state stands in the record books, they just want to hunt and be able to kill what they want whether it is a spike or a booner.