Tndeer Logo

Page 3 of 3 <123
Topic Options
#1745880 - 01/25/10 07:37 PM Re: BGG & BSK, QDMA question [Re: westtntoms]
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical


Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN

Offline
 Originally Posted By: westtntoms
 Originally Posted By: deerchaser007
 Originally Posted By: megalomaniac
BSK is exactly right...

It didn't come down from the MDWFP, it came about from the general public. The majority of the general public down here wanted the entire yearling buck population protected. The AR's are designed and vary by geographical unit to accomplish that.

It will be an interesting experiment statewide...

It has already been proven on many of the deer camps enrolled in DMAP, as well as a multitude of WMA's statewide over the past several years. I'm just not too sure Bubba on his 40 acres is going to adhere to the AR's- especially without a tagging system.


Whats gonna be interesting is how they present the data on how it did or did not work on a statewide level in few years!! As you said,.. without some sort of tag system in place,.. they have no way of data colecting from across the state.


I would assume they will continue to use the data that is avalaible, (WMA's and DMAP), and that this would represent a sampling that would be accurate to apply to the entire state. BSK could probably answer this one better though.


Upward (good) trends in the DMAP data would suggest upward trends in the "open" harvest as well, although the exact percentages between the two wouldn't be the same.

Because they really put some good research into ther new antler restrictions, I suspect they will see significant improvements in reduced yearling buck harvests for those areas that needed it, and hopefully a reduction in the older buck high-grading that had been occurring.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan

"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James

Top
#1745905 - 01/25/10 07:43 PM Re: BGG & BSK, QDMA question [Re: BSK]
westtntoms
8 Point


Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 1524
Loc: Collierville, TN

Offline
Can you talk more about the research they did? I just assumed they used data from wma's & dmap.
Top
#1746452 - 01/26/10 06:59 AM Re: BGG & BSK, QDMA question [Re: westtntoms]
BSK
Jerkasourous of the non-typical kind
Non-Typical


Registered: 03/11/99
Posts: 59548
Loc: Nashville, TN

Offline
westtntoms,

What they were looking at was the percent of the yearling age-class would be protected using various antler restrictions. The simply four-total-points rule worked fine in the poorest soil/habitat areas because most yearling in these areas didn't produce antlers better than spikes hence were protected. However, in the best soil/habitat areas (Delta Region) many yearling bucks produced antlers large enough to qualify for harvest. This was producing high-grading of the older age-classes of bucks (the "best" yearlings removed and the "worst" yearlings protected leading to smaller antlers on bucks once they reached the older age-classes).

These new ARs are intended to better protect the top-end yearling bucks in the best habitat areas, where yearling bucks can easily grow four-total-point antlers.

If you look, I bet the MS wildlife agency's website or MSU website will have detailed information on the actual research and findings. I've seen it in print form before.
_________________________
"Know where you stand, and stand there" --Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan

"There is no reasoning someone out of a position he has not reasoned himself into." --Clive James

Top
#1748989 - 01/27/10 03:34 PM Re: BGG & BSK, QDMA question [Re: BSK]
westtntoms
8 Point


Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 1524
Loc: Collierville, TN

Offline
MS has a summary report on their website. I've read that, it just summarizes why they made the changes. They also have a deer program report, which contains the data they used. I'm not able to open the report, they are mailing me a hard copy.

The bioligist told me they used data from their DMAP program, (which is included in this report)in setting the new regs.

I look forward to reading it.

Top
Page 3 of 3 <123


Moderator:  RUGER, Tennessee Todd, Unicam, Cuttin Caller, CBU93, stretch, Bobby G, Outdoor Lady, TurkeyBurd 
Hop to:
Top Posters
4097460
RUGER
80520
Deer Assassin
59548
BSK
55989
Crappie Luck
50718
spitndrum
Newest Members
ConK11, loufaulkner, melvin, woundedgun, nonfant
12107 Registered Users
Who's Online
85 registered (eastTN270, moondawg, scn, RodBone75, TNseabee, J.W.308, 17 invisible) and 147 anonymous users online.
Forum Stats
12107 Members
38 Forums
115752 Topics
1410102 Posts

Max Online: 756 @ 11/20/12 09:10 AM
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Forum Donations
The TnDeer.Com Deer Talk Forum is for Tennessee Deer Hunters by Tennessee Deer Hunters. If you enjoy using our Talk Forum and would like to contribute to help in it's up-keep. Just submit your contribution by clicking on the DONATE button below and paying with PayPal or a major credit card. Any amount is much appreciated. Thanks for your support!

TN Burn Safe

Generated in 0.01 seconds in which 0.002 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.