Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
New 6 showed up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dennis" data-source="post: 5713281" data-attributes="member: 20424"><p>That is interesting to me also. I know the best way to age a buck is by body characteristics, not rack. But still, when I see a buck with stickers, especially if those stickers have any length to them, it biases my age assumption toward 3.5+ or 4.5+. Same thing with heavy mass, it makes me think 4.5+. I've seen a number of heavy racked bucks that aged less than that by tooth wear, so probably I need to stop thinking that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dennis, post: 5713281, member: 20424"] That is interesting to me also. I know the best way to age a buck is by body characteristics, not rack. But still, when I see a buck with stickers, especially if those stickers have any length to them, it biases my age assumption toward 3.5+ or 4.5+. Same thing with heavy mass, it makes me think 4.5+. I’ve seen a number of heavy racked bucks that aged less than that by tooth wear, so probably I need to stop thinking that way. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
New 6 showed up
Top