• Advertisement

"Queers Against Pete"

This forum is for political discussions. Please keep all discussions civil.

"Queers Against Pete"

Postby TheLBLman » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:01 pm

Who would have ever thunk it.

Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg held a private fundraiser Friday morning at San Francisco’s National LGBTQ Center for the Arts, where a group of protesters gathered outside.

Many held signs reading, "Queers Against Pete."
https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article ... 057323.php

One activist told a reporter Buttigieg has been "using his gay card to propel his campaign," but is "not representative of our community."
Buttigieg is the first openly gay candidate to be a serious contender for presidential nominee of a major party.
TheLBLman
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 27818
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Advertisement

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby TheLBLman » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:04 pm

So, Buttigeig is legally "married" to a guy.

If Buttigeig became President
would his "spouse" be the "1st Wife" or the "1st Husband"?
TheLBLman
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 27818
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby BULL MOOSE » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:17 pm

First Gentlemen
BULL MOOSE
10 Point
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 1999 12:00 pm
Location: 38468

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby Pic IN the Casa » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:21 pm

I'm sure the muslim countries and new Russian block countries will respect this person if he becomes president.
When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination. Thomas Sowell
User avatar
Pic IN the Casa
16 Point
 
Posts: 16248
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:45 am
Location: TN

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby TheLBLman » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:23 pm

Pic IN the Casa wrote:I'm sure the muslim countries and new Russian block countries will respect this person if he becomes president.

And, can you image Pete's "wife" accompanying him on his travels to some of those countries?
Haven't "1st Ladies" often accompanied their husband Presidents to Saudi Arabia?

Everything about this just seems queer to me.
TheLBLman
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 27818
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby TNTreeman » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:34 pm

You all just aren't " woke" enough. Honestly , there is NO way at this time we would elect a homosexual as president. He would lose by a landslide.
TNTreeman
8 Point
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:29 pm
Location: Franklin Tn

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby iowavf » Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:56 pm

TNTreeman wrote:You all just aren't " woke" enough. Honestly , there is NO way at this time we would elect a homosexual as president. He would lose by a landslide.
I’d have to agree, he’d look even weeker than Obama did.
User avatar
iowavf
12 Point
 
Posts: 6291
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: southwest iowa

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby farmin68 » Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:45 pm

TheLBLman wrote:So, Buttigeig is legally "married" to a guy.

If Buttigeig became President
would his "spouse" be the "1st Wife" or the "1st Husband"?


I don't know the answer to that.

All I know is I'm thankful we're not going to have to figure that out.
farmin68
16 Point
 
Posts: 16863
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: 'Merica

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby MUP » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:00 am

One thing is certain, that for the country to even have this choice to consider, that we've sank from the moral surface into the abyss, and are continuing to sink further. :(. There's nothing "open-minded" or "inclusive" about condoning this type of behavior, it's just wrong, on every level, except for that twilight zone level that the liberals live in I suppose.
Image "Amateurs" built the Ark.

"Professionals" built the Titanic.
User avatar
MUP
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 72895
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:04 am
Location: Just North of Chatt-town

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby Pic IN the Casa » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:06 am

Satan is the proprietor of Woke.
When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination. Thomas Sowell
User avatar
Pic IN the Casa
16 Point
 
Posts: 16248
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:45 am
Location: TN

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby Wildcat » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:32 am

One activist told a reporter Buttigieg has been "using his gay card to propel his campaign," but is "not representative of our community."

Change two words to Obama and blacks and you have the very same story.
User avatar
Wildcat
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 56282
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Western Ky.

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby Wildcat » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:43 am

TheLBLman wrote:So, Buttigeig is legally "married" to a guy.

If Buttigeig became President
would his "spouse" be the "1st Wife" or the "1st Husband"?


It depends on what they call each other.
User avatar
Wildcat
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 56282
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Western Ky.

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby poorhunter » Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:25 am

MUP wrote:One thing is certain, that for the country to even have this choice to consider, that we've sank from the moral surface into the abyss, and are continuing to sink further. :(. There's nothing "open-minded" or "inclusive" about condoning this type of behavior, it's just wrong, on every level, except for that twilight zone level that the liberals live in I suppose.


I’ve said it before...they aren’t all that interested in winning elections but more so changing the culture. They know how to play the long game. They don’t care if Pete wins they just want him and his lifestyle to win. They hate God and His people and His ways. I know docpoco and his ilk will say “no, we don’t hate anybody!” “It’s you that are the haters!” Everyone knows that’s bunk including him. I’ve read all his posts and if one were to listen to him you’d see the playbook plainly right out of Gramci and Alinski and “After the Ball” and Marx etc. Of course these people and ideas are known for what they are, but they SOUND SO GOOD and more and more people will believe them. They have the media the schools and the entertainment, all it takes now is time. Too bad the Christians go right along (for the most part) blindly enjoying life right along with them and then ask “how’d we get here?”. It’s not the Marxist socialist humanists fault, it’s the church’s fault .
poorhunter
10 Point
 
Posts: 4204
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:23 pm
Location: Hickman county

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby fairchaser » Sat Feb 15, 2020 10:22 am

We can and should stand for what is right (Biblical). But sin will continue until Christ returns for His church. It’s sad to see this decline in our culture but it shouldn’t surprise Christians. It’s happened before and God dealt with it and He will again. It’s not our place to condemn but to love unbelievers and pray for their conversion. This in no way means we support their activities unless they line up to Gods word.
User avatar
fairchaser
12 Point
 
Posts: 6315
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: TN, USA

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby TNTreeman » Sat Feb 15, 2020 10:22 am

Pic IN the Casa wrote:Satan is the proprietor of Woke.

:super: I am totally stealing that . Exactly right!!
TNTreeman
8 Point
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:29 pm
Location: Franklin Tn

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby Bambi Buster » Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:28 pm

Elections, past and future, had/have consequences, some of which are foreseeable to those who pay attention.

Buttgiggle.jpg
Buttgiggle.jpg (49.38 KiB) Viewed 1363 times
"The American military is like a finely crafted sword. To be effective, it must be wielded by a discerning, skilled and merciless hand."
User avatar
Bambi Buster
16 Point
 
Posts: 17744
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 1:00 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby MUP » Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:01 pm

TheLBLman wrote:So, Buttigeig is legally "married" to a guy.

If Buttigeig became President
would his "spouse" be the "1st Wife" or the "1st Husband"?


How about "Butti Kisser" :rotf:
Image "Amateurs" built the Ark.

"Professionals" built the Titanic.
User avatar
MUP
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 72895
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:04 am
Location: Just North of Chatt-town

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby poorhunter » Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:09 pm

docpoco wrote:
fairchaser wrote:We can and should stand for what is right (Biblical). But sin will continue until Christ returns for His church. It’s sad to see this decline in our culture but it shouldn’t surprise Christians. It’s happened before and God dealt with it and He will again. It’s not our place to condemn but to love unbelievers and pray for their conversion. This in no way means we support their activities unless they line up to Gods word.


Just a continuation of this thought.

Biblically speaking, you are obviously right on. I think one of the great cruxes the church will face moving into the future is that it feels like many don't treat all sin as equal.

Christians will admonish Pete for being gay if he is elected. But have seemingly given passes to divorce and serial adultery. Its going to present a very real credibility problem for the future.

God may not need credibility to do his work, but the church as the hands and feet do. Many younger people see the church as a place rife with hypocrisy and I think it's exceptionally dangerous.

I appreciate your views on this.


We have acceptance of homosexuality in our culture because the church accepted fornication and adultery, not to mention a lot of other sins. The church is more interested in being “relevant” instead of holy and pure. Churches “sell” themselves to the masses with all kinds of dog and pony shows instead of sharing the Gospel and the transforming power it is. Lots of churches are full of people looking to “consume” what this or that church has to offer their family (especially their wife and kids) instead offering beauty goodness and truth.The Church doesn’t want to call sin sin because “it might scare somebody away” or “they might call me “”judgmental””. The church needs to wake up and be true to the Scriptures and not try to appeal or appease the unregenerate. Those churches that are doing these things are growing and are attractive because the Gospel is a beautiful thing.
poorhunter
10 Point
 
Posts: 4204
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:23 pm
Location: Hickman county

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby dr » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:26 pm

Hey, Oboma, and Michael got away with it for 8 years :party:
The Forest was shrinking, But the trees kept voting for the Axe, because it's handle was made of wood. And, they thought it was one of them.
dr
12 Point
 
Posts: 6848
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: USA

Re: "Queers Against Pete"

Postby TheLBLman » Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:49 pm

Well, I'm wondering if a new narrative for the Pete Buttigieg campaign will claim
he would become the United States' 1st Woman President?

Mayor Pete is consistently referring to his spouse as his "husband",
so does that mean Pete is the "wife"?

If he were to go to Saudi Arabia to meet with the Crown Prince,
would a President Pete be required to wear a hijab
while the "1st Husband" would not?

If you think this is a bit far-fetched for some to start claiming Pete Buttigieg would become the nation's first "woman" President",
just remember how the same democratic operatives once seriously promoted Bill Clinton as the nation's first "Black" President.

Interesting banter . . . .
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/buttig ... h-limbaugh
TheLBLman
Non-Typical
 
Posts: 27818
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN

Next

Return to Political Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 94user, levi, poorhunter, TDW05, TNRazorback and 59 guests